Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-chemokine gene expression signature for clinical use in a CLIA laboratory
Anders BerglundiD, John PuskasiD, Sean YoderiD, Andrew T. SmithiD, Douglas C. MarchioniD, Dahui QiniD, James J. MuléiD, Javier F. Torres–RocaiD, Steven A. EschrichiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe radiation sensitivity index (RSI) and 12-chemokine gene expression signature (12CK GES) are two gene expression signatures (GES) that were previously developed to predict tumor radiation sensitivity or identify the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures in tumors, respectively. To advance the use of these GES into clinical trial evaluation, their assays must be assessed within the context of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) process. MethodsUsing HG-U133Plus 2.0 arrays, we first established CLIA laboratory proficiency. Then the accuracy (limit of detection and macrodissection impact), precision (variability by time and operator), sample type (surgery vs. biopsy), and concordance with reference laboratory were evaluated. ResultsRSI and 12CK GES were reproducible (RSI: 0.01 mean difference, 12CK GES 0.17 mean difference) and precise with respect to time and operator. Taken together, the reproducibility analysis of the scores indicated a median RSI difference of 0.06 (6.47% of range) across samples and a median 12CK GES difference of 0.92 (12.29% of range). Experiments indicated that the lower limit of input RNA is 5 ng. Reproducibility with a second CLIA laboratory demonstrated reliability with the median RSI score difference of 0.065 (6% of full range) and 12CK GES difference of 0.93 (12 % of observed range). ConclusionsOverall, under CLIA, RSI and 12CK GES were demonstrated by the Moffitt Cancer Center Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory to be reproducible GES for clinical usage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Field percentile
- top 24%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improved radiation expression profiling in blood by sequential application of sensitive and specific gene signatures
Eliseos J. Mucaki, Ben C. Shirley, Peter K. Rogan·International Journal of Radiation BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2021
- Genomic-Adjusted Radiation Dose from Bulk RNA Sequencing for Personalized Radiotherapy
Drew T. Bergman, Jill Durkin, … Jacob G. Scott·bioRxiv·May 30, 2026
- RadiationGeneSigDB: A database of oxic and hypoxic radiation response gene signatures and their utility in identification of hypoxia-regulated MicroRNA
Venkata SK. Manem, Andrew Dhawan·British Journal of RadiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2019
- Comparative Evaluation of cobas Influenza A/B & RSV and Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV for Rapid Detection of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
- SOS1 inhibition enhances the efficacy of and delays resistance to G12C inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma
B. R. Daley, N. E. Sealover, … R. L. Kortum·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023
- Effects of G2 checkpoint dynamics on the low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity
O. Olobatuyi, G. de Vries, T. Hillen·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2017