Pangenome databases provide superior host removal and mycobacteria classification from clinical metagenomic data
Abstract
BackgroundCulture-free real-time sequencing of clinical metagenomic samples promises both rapid pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance profiling. However, this approach introduces the risk of patient DNA leakage. To mitigate this risk, we need near-comprehensive removal of human DNA sequence at the point of sequencing, typically involving use of resource-constrained devices. Existing benchmarks have largely focused on use of standardised databases and largely ignored the computational requirements of depletion pipelines as well as the impact of human genome diversity. ResultsWe benchmarked host removal pipelines on simulated Illumina and Nanopore metagenomic samples. We found that construction of a custom kraken database containing diverse human genomes results in the best balance of accuracy and computational resource usage. In addition, we benchmarked pipelines using kraken and minimap2 for taxonomic classification of Mycobacterium reads using standard and custom databases. With a database representative of the Mycobacterium genus, both tools obtained near-perfect precision and recall for classification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Computational efficiency of these custom databases was again superior to most standard approaches, allowing them to be executed on a laptop device. ConclusionsNanopore sequencing and a custom kraken human database with a diversity of genomes leads to superior host read removal from simulated metagenomic samples while being executable on a laptop. In addition, constructing a taxon-specific database provides excellent taxonomic read assignment while keeping runtime and memory low. We make all customised databases and pipelines freely available.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications
K. N. Govender, D. W. Eyre·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Removing Contaminants from Metagenomic Databases
Jennifer Lu, Steven L. Salzberg·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2018
- Deacon: fast sequence filtering and contaminant depletion
Bede Constantinides, John A. Lees, Derrick W. Crook·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2025
- From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools
Robyn Wright, A. Comeau, Morgan G. I. Langille·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2023
- BugSeq: a highly accurate cloud platform for long-read metagenomic analyses
Jeremy Fan, Steven Huang, Samuel D. Chorlton·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2021
- Comprehensive benchmarking of metagenomic classification tools for long-read sequencing data
Josip Marić, Krešimir Križanović, … Mile Šikić·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2024