Misspellings or miscellings- non-verifiable cell lines in cancer research publications
Danielle J. OsteiD, Pranujan PathmendraiD, Reese A. K. RichardsoniD, Gracen Johnson, Yida Ao, Maya D. Arya, Naomi R. Enochs, Muhammed Hussein, Jinghan Kang, Aaron Lee, Jonathan J. DanoniD, Guillaume CabanaciD, Cyril LabbéiD, Amanda Capes‐DavisiD, Thomas StoegeriD, Jennifer Anne ByrneiD
Abstract
Reproducible laboratory research relies on correctly identified reagents. We have previously described human gene research papers with wrongly identified nucleotide sequence reagent(s), including papers studying miR-145. Manually verifying reagent identities in more recent miR-145 papers found 20/36 (56%) and 6/36 (17%) miR-145 papers with misidentified nucleotide sequence reagent(s) and human cell line(s), respectively. We also found 5 cell line identifiers in two miR-145 papers with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences and cell lines, and 18 identifiers published elsewhere that did not correspond to indexed cell lines. These cell line identifiers were described as non-verifiable, as their identities appeared uncertain. Studying 420 papers that mentioned 8 different non-verifiable cell line identifier(s) found 235 papers (56%) that appeared to refer to BGC-803, BSG-803, BSG-823, GSE-1, HGC-7901, HGC-803 and/or MGC-823 as independent cell lines. We could not find publications describing how these cell lines were established, and they were not indexed in claimed externally accessible cell line repositories. While some papers stated that STR profiles had been generated for BGC-803, GSE-1 and/or MGC-823 cells, no STR profiles were identified. In summary, non-verifiable human cell lines represent new challenges to research reproducibility and require further investigation to clarify their identities. Novelty and Impact StatementThrough verifying reagent identities in research publications, our team found 23 non-verifiable human cell line identifiers, most of which could represent misspellings of contaminated cancer cell lines. Of 8 identifiers studied in detail, 7 non-verifiable identifiers were unexpectedly referred to as independent cell lines across 235 publications. We therefore describe a process "miscelling", where published cell lines lack descriptions of how they were established, cannot be found in claimed external repositories and lack STR profiles.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Verification of human nucleotide sequence reagents and cell line identities in original circRNA articles published in high impact factor journals
Pranujan Pathmendra, Francisco J. Enguita, Jennifer Anne Byrne·RNAPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2026
- Evidence provided by high-impact cell culture studies does not support authors' claims
A. B. Ozkaya, C. Geyik·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021
- Human gene function publications that describe wrongly identified nucleotide sequence reagents are unacceptably frequent within the genetics literature
Yasunori Park, Rachael A. West, … Jennifer Anne Byrne·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2022
- Cell-Line Annotation on Europe PubMed Central
Jee-Hyub Kim·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2014
- Fibroblasts cell lines misclassified as cancer cell lines
Antoine de Weck, Hans Bitter, Audrey Kauffmann·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2017
- Keeping it clean: the cell culture quality control experience at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
J. S. Roth, T. D. Lee, … M. D. Hall·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2019