bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Evaluation of potential serum analytes for individuals at-risk of multiple sclerosis
Kristin MountsiD, Yunduo LiuiD, Masashi FujitaiD, Juliana Oyegunle, Tradite NezirajiD, Susan V. Pollak, Renu NandakumariD, Nyater NgouthiD, Sonya U. SteeleiD, Irene C. M. CorteseiD, Charles C. WhiteiD, Steven JacobsoniD, Daniel S. ReichiD, Philip L. De JageriD
Abstract
Circulating proteins have been widely investigated as potential biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet findings across studies are often inconsistent, likely reflecting differences in disease stage, treatment exposure, and cohort composition. Studying individuals at elevated risk of MS prior to disease onset offers a unique opportunity to identify immune alterations that precede clinical disease while minimizing confounders. Here, we investigated whether alterations in six previously MS-associated biomarkers are detectable and associate to underlying genetic susceptibility in two independent sample collections comprising people with MS (pwMS), healthy controls, and asymptomatic first-degree relatives of pwMS from the Genes & Environment in MS (GEMS) study cohort. The panel, representing complementary axes of MS immunopathology, included granzyme A (GZMA), MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK), interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL2RA), osteopontin (SPP1), CD30 (TNFRSF8), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1). None of the proteins demonstrated associations with MS. A composite score constructed from externally derived effect estimates was not associated with MS status in either collection or in meta-analysis. Among asymptomatic first-degree relatives, the composite score was not significantly associated with group status. In contrast, an inverse correlation between SPP1 and the MS genetic risk score among GEMS participants was found ({beta} = -0.246, p = 0.001). Together, these findings suggest that several circulating proteins recently proposed as MS biomarkers are not robust tools to distinguish MS from healthy individuals. However, SPP1 levels are highlighted for further evaluation among at-risk individuals, and further work is needed to determine whether circulating immune signatures can capture the earliest stages of MS in at-risk individuals.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Association Between Polygenic Risk Score And Gut Microbiome Of Multiple Sclerosis
Noha Salah Elsayed, Robert K. Valenzuela, … Sanjay K. Shukla·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2022
- Syndecan-1 as specific cerebrospinal fluid biomarker of multiple sclerosis
Geoffrey Hinsinger, Lucile Du Trieu de Terdonck, … Éric Thouvenot·bioRxiv·May 10, 2023
- Pleiotropic Genetic Effects between Multiple Sclerosis and Musculoskeletal Traits
Sohyun Jeong, Ming‐Ju Tsai, … Yi‐Hsiang Hsu·medRxiv·Sep 12, 2023
- A higher burden of multiple sclerosis genetic risk confers an earlier onset
Elina Misicka, Mary Feller Davis, … Farren B. S. Briggs·Multiple Sclerosis JournalPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2021
- Gene-environment interactions in Multiple Sclerosis: a UK Biobank study
Benjamin M. Jacobs, Alastair John Noyce, … Ruth Dobson·Neurology Neuroimmunology & NeuroinflammationPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2021
- The Multiple Sclerosis Genomic Map: Role of peripheral immune cells and resident microglia in susceptibility
Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos, Sergio E. Baranzini, … John W. Thorpe·SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2019