Assessing the role of bacterial innate and adaptive immunity as barriers to conjugative plasmids
Berit SiedentopiD, Carlota Losa MediavillaiD, Roger D. KouyosiD, Sebastian BonhoefferiD, Hélène ChabasiD
Abstract
Plasmids are ubiquitous mobile genetic elements, that can be either costly or beneficial for their bacterial host. In response to constant viral threat, bacteria have evolved various immune systems, such as the prevalent restriction modification (RM) (innate immunity) and CRISPR-Cas systems (adaptive immunity). At the molecular level, both systems also target plasmids, but the consequences of these interactions for plasmid spread are unclear. Using a modeling approach, we show that RM and CRISPR-Cas are effective as barriers against the spread of costly plasmids, but not against beneficial ones. Consequently, bacteria can profit from the adaptive advantages that beneficial plasmids confer even in the presence of bacterial immunity. While plasmids that are costly for bacteria may persist for a certain period in the bacterial population, RM and CRISPR-Cas pose a substantial burden for such plasmids, which can eventually drive them to extinction. Finally, we demonstrate that the selection pressure imposed by bacterial immunity on costly plasmids can be circumvented through a diversity of escape mechanisms and highlight how plasmid carriage might be common despite bacterial immunity. In summary, the population-level outcome of interactions between plasmids and defense systems in a bacterial population is closely tied to plasmid cost: Beneficial plasmids can persist at high prevalence in bacterial populations despite defense systems, while costly plasmids may face substantial reduction in prevalence or even extinction.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Field percentile
- top 25%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- My host's enemy is my enemy: plasmids carrying CRISPR-Cas as a defence against phages
Berit Siedentop, Dario Rüegg, … Hélène Chabas·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2024
- How important is CRISPR-Cas for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements??
E. Westra, B. R. Levin·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2020
- A diverse repertoire of anti-defense systems is encoded in the leading region of plasmids
B. Samuel, D. Burstein·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- CRISPR-Cas is beneficial in plasmid competition, but limited by competitor toxin-antitoxin activity when horizontally transferred
David Sünderhauf, Jahn R Ringger, … Stineke van Houte·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026
- Widespread immune systems protect bacteria against conjugative plasmids
Ludovic Poiré, Julie Baltenneck, … Xavier Charpentier·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2026
- Various plasmid strategies limit the effect of bacterial Restriction-Modification systems against conjugation.
Tatiana Dimitriu, Mark D. Szczelkun, Edze Rients Westra·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2024