Gene count normalization in single-cell imaging-based spatially resolved transcriptomics
Lyla AttaiD, Kalen CliftoniD, Manjari M-G AnantiD, Gohta AiharaiD, Jean FaniD
Abstract
Recent advances in imaging-based spatially resolved transcriptomics (im-SRT) technologies now enable high-throughput profiling of targeted genes and their locations in fixed tissues. Normalization of gene expression data is often needed to account for technical factors that may confound underlying biological signals. Here, we investigate the potential impact of different gene count normalization methods with different targeted gene panels in the analysis and interpretation of im-SRT data. Using different simulated gene panels that overrepresent genes expressed in specific tissue regions or cell types, we demonstrate how normalization methods based on detected gene counts per cell differentially impact normalized gene expression magnitudes in a region- or cell type-specific manner. We show that these normalization-induced effects may reduce the reliability of downstream analyses including differential gene expression, gene fold change, and spatially variable gene analysis, introducing false positive and false negative results when compared to results obtained from gene panels that are more representative of the gene expression of the tissues component cell types. These effects are not observed with normalization approaches that do not use detected gene counts for gene expression magnitude adjustment, such as with cell volume or cell area normalization. We recommend using non-gene count-based normalization approaches when feasible and evaluating gene panel representativeness before using gene count-based normalization methods if necessary. Overall, we caution that the choice of normalization method and gene panel may impact the biological interpretation of the im-SRT data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 33
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcriptional output, cell types densities and normalization in spatial transcriptomics
Manuel Saiselet, Joel Rodrigues Vitória, … Vincent Detours·Journal of Molecular Cell BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2020
- Joint imputation and deconvolution of gene expression across spatial transcriptomics platforms
Hongyu Zheng, Hirak Sarkar, Benjamin J. Raphael·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Spatial Transcriptomics As Rasterized Image Tensors (STARIT) characterizes cell states with subcellular molecular heterogeneity
Dee Velazquez, Caleb Hallinan, … Jean Fan·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2026
- Cell segmentation and gene imputation for imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
Yunshan Zhong, Xianwen Ren·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2023
- GPSNorm: Gaussian Process Spatial Normalization for Spatial Transcriptomics
Art Taychameekiatchai, Xiaowei Zhan, … Peifeng Ruan·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- Normalizing single-cell RNA sequencing data with internal spike-in-like genes
Li Lin, Minfang Song, … Liye Zhang·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2020