Sign in
BioinformaticsJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Peer-reviewed journal article

The use of a graph database is a complementary approach to a classical similarity search for identifying commercially available fragment merges

Stephanie WillsiD, Rubén Sánchez-GarcíaiD, Tim DudgeoniD, Stephen D. RoughleyiD, Andy T. MerrittiD, Roderick E. HubbardiD, James E. P. DavidsoniD, F. von DelftiD, Charlotte Mary DeaneiD

Abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWFragment screening using X-ray crystallography can yield rich structural data to help guide the optimization of low-molecular-weight compounds into more potent binders. Fragment merging, whereby substructural motifs from partially overlapping fragments are incorporated into a single larger compound, represents a potentially powerful and efficient approach for increasing potency. Searching commercial catalogues provides one useful way to quickly and cheaply identify follow-up compounds for purchase and further screening, and circumvents the challenge of synthetic accessibility. The Fragment Network is a graph database that provides a novel way to explore the chemical space surrounding fragment hits. We use an iteration of the database containing >120 million catalogue compounds to find fragment merges for four XChem fragment screening campaigns. Retrieved molecules were filtered using a pipeline of 2D and 3D filters and contrasted against a traditional fingerprint-based similarity search. The two search techniques were found to have complementary results, identifying merges in different regions of chemical space. Both techniques were able to identify merges that are predicted to replicate the interactions made by the parent fragments. This work demonstrates the use of the Fragment Network to increase the yield of fragment merges beyond that of a classical catalogue search, thus increasing the likelihood of finding promising follow-up compounds. We present a pipeline that is able to systematically exploit all known fragment hits by performing large-scale enumeration of all possible fragment pairs for merging.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
23
FWCI
3.28
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWills '24Andrianov '21Schulze '26Elizarova '25Carbery '22Shimizu '26
74% semantic matchBioinformatics
Stephanie Wills, Rubén Sánchez-García, Stephen D. Roughley+4 more·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2024· 4 citations