Sign in
GeneticsCancer Causes & Control
Peer-reviewed journal article

Population-based Relative Risks for Specific Family History Constellations of Breast Cancer

Frederick S. Albright, Wendy K. KohlmanniD, Leigh A. NeumayeriD, Saundra S. BuysiD, Cindy Brown MatseniD, Kimberly A. KaphingstiD, Lisa Cannon‐AlbrightiD

Abstract

PurposeUsing a large resource linking genealogy with decades of cancer data, RRs were estimated for breast cancer (BC) based on specific family history extending to first cousins.\n\nMethodsRRs for BC were estimated in 640,366 females with breast cancer family histories that included number of first-(FDR), second-(SDR), and third-degree relatives (TDR), maternal and paternal relatives, and age at earliest diagnosis.\n\nResultsRRs for first-degree relatives of BC cases ranged from 1.61 (=1 FDR affected, CI: 1.56, 1.67) to 5.00 ([≥]4 FDRs affected, CI: 3.35, 7.18). RRs for second degree relatives of probands with 0 affected FDRs ranged from 1.08 ([≥]1 SDR affected, CI: 1.04, 1.12) to 1.71 ([≥]4 SDRs affected, CI: 1.26, 2.27) and for second degree relatives of probands with exactly 1 FDR from 1.54 (0 SDRs affected, CI:1.47, 1.61) to 4.78 ([≥] 5 SDRs; CI 2.47, 8.35). RRs for third-degree relatives with no closer relatives affected were significantly elevated for probands with >=5 affected TDRs RR=1.32, CI: 1.11, 1.57).\n\nConclusionsThe majority of females analyzed had a family history of BC. Any number of affected FDRs or SDRs significantly increased risk for BC, and more than 4 TDRs, even with no affected FDRs or SDRs significantly increased risk. Risk prediction derived from specific and extended family history allows identification of females at highest risk even when they do not have a conventionally defined \"high risk\" family; these risks could be a powerful, efficient tool to individualize cancer prevention and screening.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
18
FWCI
0.75
Field percentile
top 31%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '22Al-Qurashi '23Hassanin '21Jackson '23Lacaze '21Ficorella '24
63% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Shuai Li, Robert J. MacInnis, Andrew Lee+16 more·The American Journal of Human Genetics·Oct 1, 2022· 20 citations