bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Protein Structure Description with rho, theta and phi: A Case Study with Caenopore-5
Abstract
Since its establishment in 1971, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has been using Cartesian coordinate system (CCS) as the standard framework for protein structure description with x, y, z. Despite the interconvertibility of CCS and spherical coordinate systems (SCS,{rho} , {theta} and{phi} ), CCS remains to date the default and the only framework for protein structure description in PDB. Recent advances in protein structure prediction (e.g., AlphaFold) revolutionized the field by integrating deep learning algorithms with experimental structural data, achieving unprecedented accuracy of protein structure prediction and relying on Cartesian representation of protein structures to extract geometric features. To this end, questions remain about what drives the next stage of continued performance improvement of protein structure prediction. Therefore, this article introduces an alternative coordinate system for protein structure description and feature extraction. Using Caenopore-5 as an example, this article redefines protein backbone structures using atomic bonding networks (ABN) within the SCS framework (ABN-SCS), leading to the extraction of a set of spherical parameters ({rho}, {theta} and{phi} ) from the NMR ensemble of Caenopore-5, encompassing 477 covalent bonds and 80 peptide bonds within its backbone for each structural model in its NMR ensemble. Finally, this work demonstrates that ABN-SCS enables characterization of spherical bond-level geometries, expanding the feature space available for computational pipelines such as AlphaFold2, and argues that integrating ABN-SCS features into protein structure prediction pipelines can enhance geometric fidelity, and that the time is now ripe for the trapped spherical features [{rho}, {theta}, {phi}] to be integrated into algorithms such as AF2 towards protein structure prediction with improved performance.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era
Sriniketh Vangaru, Debswapna Bhattacharya·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- FoldVision: A compute-efficient atom-level 3D protein encoder
Alexander Kroll, Shantanu Yadav, Martin J. Lercher·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2026
- Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design
Lewis Moffat, Joe G. Greener, David T. Jones·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2021
- Atomic protein structure refinement using all-atom graph representations and SE(3)-equivariant graph neural networks
Tianqi Wu, Jianlin Jack Cheng·bioRxiv·May 6, 2022
- CASTpFold: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of the universe of protein Folds
Bowei Ye, Wei Tian, … Jie Liang·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2024
- The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR
N. J. Fowler, M. P. Williamson·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2022