Clingen Cancer Somatic Working Group: standardizing and democratizing access to cancer molecular diagnostic data to drive translational research
Subha MadhavaniD, Deborah RitteriD, Christine MicheeliD, Shruti RaoiD, Angshumoy RoyiD, Dmitriy SonkiniD, Matthew McCoyiD, Malachi GriffithiD, Obi L. GriffithiD, Peter B. McGarveyiD, Shashikant KulkarniiD, On Behalf Of The Clingen Somatic Working Group
Abstract
A growing number of academic and community clinics are conducting genomic testing to inform treatment decisions for cancer patients (1). In the last 3-5 years, there has been a rapid increase in clinical use of next generation sequencing (NGS) based cancer molecular diagnostic (MolDx) testing (2). The increasing availability and decreasing cost of tumor genomic profiling means that physicians can now make treatment decisions armed with patient-specific genetic information. Accumulating research in the cancer biology field indicates that there is significant potential to improve cancer patient outcomes by effectively leveraging this rich source of genomic data in treatment planning (3). To achieve truly personalized medicine in oncology, it is critical to catalog cancer sequence variants from MolDx testing for their clinical relevance along with treatment information and patient outcomes, and to do so in a way that supports large-scale data aggregation and new hypothesis generation. One critical challenge to encoding variant data is adopting a standard of annotation of those variants that are clinically actionable. Through the NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) (4), in collaboration with NLMs ClinVar database and >50 academic and industry based cancer research organizations, we developed the Minimal Variant Level Data (MVLD) framework to standardize reporting and interpretation of drug associated alterations (5). We are currently involved in collaborative efforts to align the MVLD framework with parallel, complementary sequence variants interpretation clinical guidelines from the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP) for clinical labs (6). In order to truly democratize access to MolDx data for care and research needs, these standards must be harmonized to support sharing of clinical cancer variants. Here we describe the processes and methods developed within the ClinGens Somatic WG in collaboration with over 60 cancer care and research organizations as well as CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited clinical testing labs to develop standards for cancer variant interpretation and sharing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 34.78
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of cancer genomic variants
Alex Handler Wagner, Brian Walsh, … Adam A. Margolin·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020
- Evolution of the open-access CIViC knowledgebase is driven by the needsof the cancer variant interpretation community
Kilannin Krysiak, Arpad M. Danos, … Malachi Griffith·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2021
- The Clinical Genomic Variation Landscape
Wesley Goar, Daniel Puthawala, … Alex Handler Wagner·medRxiv·Nov 4, 2025
- Cancer SIGVAR: A semi-automated interpretation tool for germline variants of hereditary cancer-related genes
Hong Li, Shuixia Liu, … Yun Xiong·Human MutationPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2021
- The Minimal Dataset for Cancer of the 1+Million Genomes Initiative
- A methodological framework for accommodating Cancer Genomics Information in OMOP-CDM using Variation Representation Specification (VRS).
Elisa Benetti, Guido Scicolone, … Michela Riba·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2026