bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
The rise of cheats during experimental evolution is restricted by non-kin interactions between Bacillus subtilis soil isolates
K. Belcijan Pandur, B. Kraigher, A. Tomac, P. Stefanic, I. Mandic Mulec
Abstract
Cooperative behaviors in human, animal, and even microbial societies are vulnerable to exploitation. Kin discrimination (KD) has been hypothesized to help stabilize cooperation. However, the mechanisms that sustain cooperative behavior remain poorly understood. We here investigate the role of KD in limiting the rise of cheats during surfactant dependent cooperative swarming over surfaces by bacterium Bacillus subtilis as a model organism. We show that mixing surfactant secreting cooperators and cheats that do not produce surfactants leads to cooperation collapse. However, when such mixed swarms transiently encounter non-kin B. subtilis swarms, the frequency of the surfactant nonproducers decreases, suggesting that kinship dependent interactions may limit cheats advantage. To further validate this hypothesis, we subjected wild-type co-operators to transient encounters with kin and non-kin swarms over 20 cycles of experimental evolution. Evolved populations exposed to non-kin swarms exhibited lower occurrences of genotypes with defective swarming phenotypes compared to those encountering kin swarms. These results provide compelling support for the prediction that the evolution of cheats in bacterial populations is impeded by kin discrimination providing experimental proof of its role in stabilizing cooperative behavior.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The key role of cheaters in the persistence of cooperation
S. G. Babajanyan, Yuri I. Wolf, … Nash D. Rochman·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2026
- Allopatric divergence of cooperators confers cheating resistance and limits the effects of a defector mutation
K. A. Schaal, Y.-T. N. Yu, … G. J. Velicer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2021
- Privatisation rescues function following loss of cooperation
S. B. Andersen, M. Ghoul, … A. S. Griffin·bioRxiv·May 22, 2018
- Signatures of kin selection in a natural population of the bacteria Bacillus subtilis
L. J. Belcher, A. E. Dewar, … S. A. West·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2022
- Genetic architecture constrains exploitation of siderophore cooperation in Burkholderia cenocepacia
S. Sathe, A. Mathew, … R. Kummerli·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2019
- Maintenance of cooperation in a yeast population in a public-good driven system.