henhaobio
Sign in

Neurobiology of PainNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor as a model of temporomandibular disorder: nature, time-course, and sex differences characterising the pain experience

Siobhan M. SchabruniD, Emily Si, Samantha K. MillardiD, Alan KI ChiangiD, S. Chen, Nahian Shahmat ChowdhuryiD, David Anthony SeminowicziD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundTemporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a common condition that frequently transitions to chronic symptoms. Experimental pain models that mimic the symptoms of clinical TMD may be useful in understanding the mechanisms, and sex differences, present in this disorder. Here we aimed to comprehensively characterise the nature and time-course of pain, functional impairment and hyperalgesia induced by repeated intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) into the masseter muscle, and to investigate sex differences in the NGF-induced pain experience. Methods94 healthy individuals participated in a longitudinal observational study with 30-day follow-up. NGF was injected into the right masseter muscle on Day 0 and Day 2. Participants attended laboratory sessions to assess pain (Numerical Rating Scale; NRS), functional limitation (mouth opening distance, Jaw Functional Limitation Scale; JFLS) and mechanical sensitization (pressure pain thresholds; PPTs) on Days 0, 2 and 5 and completed twice daily electronic pain dairies from Day 0 to day 30. ResultsPeak pain averaged 2.0/10 (95 % CI: 1.6-2.4) at rest and 4.3/10 (95 % CI: 3.9-4.8) on chewing. Pain-free mouth opening distance reduced from 5.0 cm (95 % CI: 4.8-5.1 cm) on Day 0 to 3.7 cm (95 % CI: 3.5-3.9 cm) on Day 5. The greatest reduction in PPTs was observed over the masseter muscle. Females experienced higher pain, greater functional impairment, and greater sensitivity to mechanical stimuli than males. ConclusionIntramuscular injection of NGF is a useful model with which to explore the mechanisms, and sex differences, present in clinical TMD.

Citations
18
FWCI
5.25
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHolzscherer '25Alshanqiti '24Son '24Hovhannisya '25Lindquist '23Abdulrahim '25
80% semantic matchNeuroscience
Erin J. Holzscherer, Rhonda Kersten, Mathilde Bertrand+4 more·Journal of Neurophysiology·Nov 5, 2025