Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Neural Correlates of Cognition in Primary Visual versus Neighboring Posterior Cortices during Visual Evidence-Accumulation-based Navigation

Sue Ann KoayiD, Stephan Y. ThibergeiD, Carlos D. BrodyiD, David W. TankiD

Abstract

Studies of perceptual decision-making have often assumed that the main role of sensory cortices is to provide sensory input to downstream processes that accumulate and drive behavioral decisions. We performed a systematic comparison of neural activity in primary visual (V1) to secondary visual and retrosplenial cortices, as mice performed a task where they should accumulate pulsatile visual cues through time to inform a navigational decision. Even in V1, only a small fraction of neurons had sensory-like responses to cues. Instead, in all areas neurons were sequentially active, and contained information ranging from sensory to cognitive, including cue timings, evidence, place/time, decision and reward outcome. Per-cue sensory responses were amplitude-modulated by various cognitive quantities, notably accumulated evidence. This inspired a multiplicative feedback-loop circuit hypothesis that proposes a more intricate role of sensory areas in the accumulation process, and furthermore explains a surprising observation that perceptual discrimination deviates from Weber-Fechner Law.\n\nHighlights / eTOC BlurbO_LIMice made navigational decisions based on accumulating pulsatile visual cues\nC_LIO_LIThe bulk of neural activity in visual cortices was sequential and beyond-sensory\nC_LIO_LIAccumulated pulse-counts modulated sensory (cue) responses, suggesting feedback\nC_LIO_LIA feedback-loop neural circuit explains behavioral deviations from Webers Law\nC_LI\n\nIn a task where navigation was informed by accumulated pulsatile visual evidence, neural activity in visual cortices predominantly coded for cognitive variables across multiple timescales, including outside of a visual processing context. Even sensory responses to visual pulses were amplitude-modulated by accumulated pulse counts and other variables, inspiring a multiplicative feedback-loop circuit hypothesis that in turn explained behavioral deviations from Weber-Fechner Law.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKoay '20Armstrong '26Oršolić '21Lee '26Bondy '18Lee '18
84% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sue Ann Koay, Stephan Y. Thiberge, Carlos D. Brody+1 more·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020