Development and validation of PainFace, a software platform that simplifies and standardizes mouse grimace analyses
Eric S. McCoyiD, Sang Kyoon Park, Rahul P. Patel, Dan F. Ryan, Zachary J. Mullen, Jacob J. Nesbitt, Josh E. Lopez, Bonnie Taylor‐BlakeiD, James L. Krantz, Wenxin HuiD, Rosanna L. Garris, Lucas Vasconcelos LimaiD, Susana G. Sotocinal, Jean‐Sebastien AustiniD, Adam D. KashlaniD, Jessica A. JiméneziD, Sanya ShahiD, Abigail K. Trocinski, Kelly A. Vanden, Rami MajoriD, Hannah BazickiD, Morgan R. KleiniD, Jeffrey S. MogiliD, Guorong Wu AiD, Mark J. ZylkaiD
Abstract
Facial grimaces are now commonly used to quantify spontaneous pain in mice and other mammalian species, but scoring remains subjective and relies on humans with very different levels of proficiency. Here, we developed a Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) for black-coated (C57BL/6) mice consisting of four facial action units (orbitals, nose, ears, whiskers). We used this scale to generate ground truth data from over 70,000 images of black mice in different settings. With this large data set, we developed a deep neural network and cloud-based software platform called PainFace (http://painface.net) that accurately scores facial grimaces of black mice on a 0-8 scale. PainFace generates over two orders of magnitude more MGS data than humans can realistically achieve, and at superhuman speed. By analyzing the frequency distribution of grimace scores, we found that mice spent >7x more time in a high grimace state following laparotomy surgery relative to sham surgery controls. The analgesic carprofen reduced the amount of time animals spent in this high grimace state after surgery. Specific facial action unit score combinations were overrepresented following laparotomy surgery, suggesting that characteristic facial expressions are associated with a high grimace state. We performed validation experiments in two labs located in different countries to demonstrate reproducibility of the PainFace platform. To further enhance rigor and reproducibility, we will invite pain researchers to beta test PainFace and then incorporate their feedback into the software and manuscript prior to peer review. While this study is focused on mice, PainFace was designed to simplify, standardize, and scale up grimace analyses with many other mammalian species, including humans.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- LabGrymace: Automated Analysis of Mouse Grimace for Quantitative Assessment of Pain Dynamics
Wenjin Dong, Kayla M. Moehn, … Bing Ye·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2026
- Automatic pain face analysis in mice: Applied to a varied dataset with non-standardized conditions
Niek Andresen, Manuel Wöllhaf, … Katharina Hohlbaum·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2026
- Machine-Learning-Guided Video Analysis Identifies Sound-Evoked Pain Behaviors from Facial Grimace and Body Cues in Mice
Benjamin J. Seicol, Amelie Valles, … Megan Beers Wood·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2025
- GrimACE: Automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice
Oliver Sturman, Marcel Schmutz, … Johannes Bohacek·Lab AnimalPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2026
- Towards a fully automated surveillance of well-being status in laboratory mice using deep learning
N. Andresen, M. Wöllhaf, … V. Belik·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2019
- Different Paradigms from Computer Vision Align with Human Assessment of the Mouse Grimace Scale
Michelle Reimann, Jacer Aloui, … Patrik Reiske·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2026