Dopamine modulates dynamic decision-making during foraging
Campbell J. Le HeroniD, Nils KollingiD, Olivia PlantiD, Annika KienastiD, Rebecca JanskaiD, Yuen‐Siang AngiD, Sean James FalloniD, Masud Husain BiD, Matthew A J AppsiD
Abstract
The mesolimbic dopaminergic system exerts a crucial influence on incentive processing. However, the contribution of dopamine in dynamic, ecological situations where reward rates vary, and decisions evolve over time, remains unclear. In such circumstances, current (foreground) reward accrual needs to be compared continuously with potential rewards that could be obtained by travelling elsewhere (background reward rate), in order to determine the opportunity cost of staying versus leaving. We hypothesised that dopamine specifically modulates the influence of background - but not foreground - reward information when making a dynamic comparison of these variables for optimal behaviour. On a novel foraging task based on an ecological account of animal behaviour (marginal value theorem), human participants were required to decide when to leave locations in situations where foreground rewards depleted at different rates, either in rich or poor environments with high or low background rates. In line with theoretical accounts, peoples decisions to move from current locations were independently modulated by both foreground and background reward rates. Pharmacological manipulation of dopamine D2 receptor activity using the agonist cabergoline significantly affected decisions to move on, specifically modulating the effect of background but not foreground rewards rates. In particular, when on cabergoline, people left patches in poor environments much earlier. These results demonstrate a role of dopamine in signalling the opportunity cost of rewards, not value per se. Using this ecologically derived framework we uncover a specific mechanism by which D2 dopamine receptor activity modulates decision-making when foreground and background reward rates are dynamically compared. Significance statementMany decisions, across economic, political and social spheres, involve choices to "leave". Such decisions depend on a continuous comparison of a current locations value, with that of other locations you could move on to. However, how the brain makes such decisions is poorly understood. Here, we developed a computerized task, based around theories of how animals make decisions to move on when foraging for food. Healthy human participants had to decide when to leave collecting financial rewards in a location, and travel to collect rewards elsewhere. Using a pharmacological manipulation, we show that the activity of dopamine in the brain modulates decisions to move on, with people valuing other locations differently depending on their dopaminergic state.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 84
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dopaminergic reward signals shape foraging decisions through learned value expectations
Lyle Kingsbury, Hugo May, Naoshige Uchida·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2026
- A Neural Mechanism for the Opportunity Cost of Time
Sara Madureira Constantino, Jessica Dalrymple, … Nathaniel D. Daw·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2017
- Dual credit assignment processes underlie dopamine signals in a complex spatial environment
Timothy A. Krausz, Alison E. Comrie, … Joshua D. Berke·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2023
- Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind
Adrina Kocharian, A. David Redish, Patrick E. Rothwell·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2025
- Bidirectional modulation of reward-guided decision making by dopamine
Ana Antonia Dias Maile, Theo O.J. Gründler, … Gerhard Jocham·PsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2025
- Changes in subjective preference do not require dopamine signaling or the orbital frontal cortex
Merridee J. Lefner, Alexa P. Magnon, … Matthew J. Wanat·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019