henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Corticostriatal oscillations predict high vs. low drinkers in a preclinical model of limited access alcohol consumption

Angela M. HenricksiD, Lucas L. DwieliD, Nicholas H. Deveau, Amanda A. Simon, Metztli J. Ruiz-Jaquez, Alan I. GreeniD, Wilder T. DoucetteiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Individuals differ in their vulnerability to develop alcohol dependence that are determined by innate and environmental factors. The corticostriatal circuit is heavily involved in the development of alcohol dependence and may contain neural information regarding vulnerability to drink excessively. In the current experiment, we hypothesized that we could characterize high and low alcohol-drinking rats (HD and LD, respectively) based on corticostriatal oscillations, and that these subgroups would differentially respond to corticostriatal brain stimulation. Rats were trained to drink 10% alcohol in a limited access paradigm. In separate sessions, local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=13). Based on training alcohol consumption levels, we classified rats using a median split as HD or LD. Then, using machine-learning, we built predictive models to classify rats as HD or LD by corticostriatal LFPs and compared the model performance from real data to the performance of models built on data permutations. Additionally, we explored the impact of NAcSh or mPFC stimulation on alcohol consumption in HD vs. LD. Corticostriatal LFPs were able predict HD vs. LD group classification with greater accuracy than expected by chance (>80% accuracy). Additionally, NAcSh stimulation significantly reduced alcohol consumption in HD, but not LD (p0.05). These data collectively show that the corticostriatal circuit is differentially involved in regulating alcohol intake in HD vs. LD rats, and suggests that corticostriatal activity may have the potential to predict a vulnerability to develop alcohol dependence in a clinical population.

Citations
1

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHenricks '19Hewitt '24Ardinger '25McCane '25Sipe '21Renteria '21
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Angela M. Henricks, Emily D. K. Sullivan, Lucas L. Dwiel+4 more·Biology of Sex Differences·Dec 1, 2019· 11 citations