The influence of marker number and sequencing depth on the ability to identify mismatch repair deficient tumours.
Joseph Law, Richard GalloniD, Ethan Teare, Ivan Santibanez Koref, Rachel Phelps, John BurniD, Michael S. JacksoniD, Mauro Santibanez‐KorefiD
Abstract
1.Analysis of somatic mutation patterns is widely used to infer exposure to exogenous and endogenous mutagenic influences. This raises the question of the amount of sequence data required to detect factors of interest. A common use of mutation pattern analysis is the identification of increased microsatellite instability to uncover mismatch repair (MMR) defects in tumours and normal tissues. Here we explore the effects of sequencing depth and the number of loci analysed on the ability to detect MMR deficiency using artificial neural networks and publicly available amplicon sequencing data from colorectal tumours on 24 short quasi monomorphic microsatellites (up to 12 bp in length, PMID 31471937) split in a training (99 samples) and a test set (95 samples). We show that, at a sequencing depth of 200, pairs mononucleotide repeats can achieve discrimination between MMR proficient and deficient colorectal tumours similar to that obtained with the full 24 marker panel, with accuracies above 97% and ROC AUCs in excess of 99% in the test set. Our results indicate that for short monomorphic microsatellites considering the length distribution of the different alleles at each locus, representing these distributions as two-dimensional structures and including convolutional layers in the network can facilitate discrimination between MMR deficient and proficient tumour material. They also indicate that, despite the limitations imposed by amplification, sequencing accuracy and the limited divergence time between the sequences from one locus, high depth sequencing can be used to identify MMR deficiency from a limited number of loci. However, they also suggest that, for a fixed total number of reads per sample, increasing sensitivity by increasing the number of targets is more efficient than by increasing per target sequencing depth. These results are of interest for screening large numbers of samples and for assessing the impact MMR deficiency in different areas of the genome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A novel panel of short mononucleotide repeats linked to informative polymorphisms enabling effective high volume low cost discrimination between mismatch repair deficient and proficient tumours
Lisa Redford, Ghanim Alhilal, … John Burn·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2018
- Evaluating multiple next-generation sequencing derived tumor features to accurately predict DNA mismatch repair status
Romy Walker, Peter Georgeson, … Daniel D. Buchanan·Journal of Molecular DiagnosticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2022
- Long deletion signatures in repetitive genomic regions track somatic evolution and enable sensitive detection of microsatellite instability
Qingli Guo, Jacob Househam, … Trevor A. Graham·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2024
- Mutational signature profiling classifies subtypes of clinically different mismatch repair deficient tumors with a differential immunogenic response potential
Mar Giner-Calabuig, Seila De Leon, … Rosa M. Xicola·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2021
- In search of non-coding driver mutations by deep sequencing of regulatory elements in colorectal cancer
Rebecca C Poulos, Dilmi Perera, … Jason WH Wong·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2018
- A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome
Romy Walker, Khalid Mahmood, … Daniel D. Buchanan·Journal of Translational MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023