henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS ONEGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

A novel panel of short mononucleotide repeats linked to informative polymorphisms enabling effective high volume low cost discrimination between mismatch repair deficient and proficient tumours

Lisa Redford, Ghanim Alhilal, Stephanie J. Needham, Ottie O’Brien, Julie Coaker, John R. TysoniD, Leonardo Maldaner AmorimiD, Iona Middleton, Osagie G. IzuoguiD, Mark Johan ArendsiD, Anca OniscuiD, Ángel AlonsoiD, Sira Moreno Laguna, Richard GalloniD, Harsh J. ShethiD, Mauro Santibanez‐KorefiD, Michael S. JacksoniD, John BurniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Somatic mutations in mononucleotide repeats are commonly used to assess the mismatch repair status of tumours. Current tests focus on repeats with a length above 15bp, which tend to be somatically more unstable than shorter ones. These longer repeats also have a substantially higher PCR error rate and tests that use capillary electrophoresis for fragment size analysis often require expert interpretation. In this communication, we present a panel of 17 short repeats (length 7-12bp) for sequence-based microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. Using a simple scoring procedure that incorporates the allelic distribution of the mutant repeats, and analysis of two cohort of tumours totalling 209 samples, we show that this panel is able to discriminate between MMR proficient and deficient tumours, even when constitutional DNA is not available. In the training cohort, the method achieved 100% concordance with fragment analysis, while in the testing cohort, 4 discordant samples were observed (corresponding to 97% concordance). Of these, 2 showed discrepancies between fragment analysis and immunohistochemistry and one was reclassified after re-testing using fragment analysis. These results indicate that our approach offers the option of a reliable, scalable routine test for MSI.

Citations
20
FWCI
1.52
Field percentile
top 18%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGuo '24Law '23Vlachos '26Fujimoto '19Shin '21Levy '21
68% semantic matchBioinformatics
Qingli Guo, Jacob Househam, Eszter Lakatos+11 more·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2024· 2 citations