Briefings in BioinformaticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
A novel two-sample Mendelian randomization framework integrating common and rare variants: application to assess the effect of HDL-C on preeclampsia risk
Yu ZhangiD, Ming LiiD, David M. HaasiD, C Noel Bairey Merz, Tsegaselassie WorkalemahuiD, Kelli K. RyckmaniD, Janet M. CatoviD, Lisa D Levine, Alexa A. FreedmaniD, George R. SaadeiD, Jiaqi HuiD, Hongyu ZhaoiD, Xihao LiiD, Nianjun LiuiD, Qi YaniD
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important technique for establishing causal relationships between risk factors and health outcomes. By using genetic variants as instrumental variables, it can mitigate bias due to confounding and reverse causation in observational studies. Current MR analyses have predominantly used common genetic variants as instruments, which represent only part of the genetic architecture of complex traits. Rare variants, which can have larger effect sizes and provide unique biological insights, have been understudied due to statistical and methodological challenges. We introduce MR-CARV, a novel framework integrating common and rare genetic variants in two-sample Mendelian randomization. This method leverages comprehensive genetic data made available by high-throughput sequencing technologies and large-scale consortia. Rare variants are aggregated into functional categories, such as gene-coding, gene-noncoding, and non-gene regions, by leveraging variant annotations and biological impact as weights. The effects of rare variant sets are then estimated with STAARpipeline and combined with the estimated effects of common variants by the existing MR methods. Simulation studies demonstrate that MR-CARV maintains robust type I error and achieves higher statistical power, with up to a 66.3% relative increase compared to existing methods only based on common variants. Consistent with these findings, application to real data on HDL-C and preeclampsia showed that MR-CARV(IVW) yielded a more precise and statistically significant effect estimate (-0.020, SE = 0.0102, P = 0.0470) than IVW using only common variants (-0.023, SE = 0.0123, P = 0.0659).
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants: unravelling mechanisms linking HDL-cholesterol and coronary heart disease
Stephen Burgess, Christopher N. Foley, … Joanna M. M. Howson·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2019
- MR-Clust: Clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimates
Christopher N. Foley, Amy M. Mason, … Stephen Burgess·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- MRMU: A New Paradigm for Mendelian Randomization by Accounting for Measured Covariates and Unmeasured Confounders
Xianghong Hu, Jiashun Xiao, … Can Yang·medRxiv·Jun 16, 2026
- ECC-MR: an error-correcting-code framework for robust Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy decoding on correlated instruments
Junhong Jiang, Di Hu, … Zenan Lin·medRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian Randomization
Hans van Kippersluis, Cornelius A Rietveld·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2017
- CaPri: Bayesian Mendelian randomization for joint estimation of causal and pleiotropic effects
Ou Ren, Wenmin Zhang, Tianyuan Lu·medRxiv·Oct 14, 2026