Barriers to cascade screening in people at risk of Thoracic Aortic Disease: a mixed methods evaluation from the DECIDE-TAD initiative
Riccardo Giuseppe AbbascianoiD, Joanna Colleen DionneiD, Joanne K. MikszaiD, Simon J. W. OczkowskiiD, Julian BarwelliD, Nora L. ShannoniD, R. Grant, Paul CliftiD, Riccardo ProiettiiD, E. Hope, U. Ahern, K. Hewytt, L. Ghosh, R. Kaur, M. Lewis, A. Cotton, Lorraine Skinner, H. Saadia, G. McManus, Nadeem QureshiiD, Hardeep AujlaiD, S. Page, R. Sayers, Matthew J. BowniD, J. Maltby, , Gavin James MurphyiD
Abstract
BackgroundCascade genetic and imaging screening for relatives of people with non-syndromic thoracic aortic diseases (NS-TAD) is recommended by guidelines. However, the availability and uptake of cascade screening is low. The aim of this study was to use applied health research methods to identify barriers to screening, and strategies to overcome these. MethodsA cohort study using routinely collected health data evaluated barriers to imaging, genetic testing, and treatment for people with NS-TAD. Delphi consensus exercises and workshops evaluated the screening process and patient experience. Focus groups considered strategies to overcome individual and institutional barriers to uptake. A consensus exercise evaluated the evidence to support cascade screening. ResultsA cohort study of 33,793 patients with a TAD diagnosis between 2013 and 2018 demonstrated barriers to treatment and imaging surveillance in females, non-whites, and people from-low socioeconomic backgrounds. A survey of aortic dissection survivors and relatives in England reported that 33/70 (47%) of aortic dissection survivors who responded had undergone genetic testing, including 10/22 (45%) with a positive family history of TAD. In first- and second-degree relatives 66/150 (44%) and 32/155 (21%) of respondents were offered imaging or cascade genetic testing respectively. Only 19/70 (27%) probands and 20/155 (13%) relatives who responded reported that they were involved in shared decisions about their care. Barriers to the uptake of cascade screening included limited awareness of the disease and genetic aetiology, poor health literacy, concerns about cost-effectiveness of screening with low detection rates, requirements for life-long surveillance, and the management of uncertain test results. The consensus exercise demonstrated that the certainty of the evidence to guide cascade screening was Low or Very Low. ConclusionsBarriers to the implementation of cascade screening in people at high-risk for TAD occur at multiple levels suggesting that a complex intervention is required to improve equity of access.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic Medicine Guidance: A Point-of-Care App for Heritable Thoracic Aortic Diseases
Rohan Patil, Fatima Ashraf, … Siddharth K. Prakash·medRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- Novel Genetic Variants of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection: Evidence from a Japanese Community-Based Cohort
Kentaro Akabane, Ken Nakamura, … Tetsuro Uchida·medRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- Identifying barriers to genetic testing in subspecialty cardiac care
Sierra Pond, Genevie Echols, … Briana L. Sawyer·medRxiv·May 15, 2024
- Developing best practice rare disease diagnostic care models in a real-world rural/regional setting
Lauren S. Akesson, Sanjoti Parekh, … Mathew Wallis·medRxiv·Jul 24, 2025
- Being proactive: A qualitative study of South Asian Australians perspectives of cardiovascular disease and genomic testing
Emily DeBortoli, Vaishnavi Nathan, … Tatiane Yanes·medRxiv·Jun 26, 2025
- Clinical implications of identifying pathogenic variants in aortic dissection patients with whole exome sequencing
Brooke N. Wolford, Whitney Hornsby·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018