Decoding EEG for optimizing naturalistic memory
Joseph H. RudoleriD, James P Bruska, Woohyeuk Chang, Matthew R. DoughertyiD, Brandon S Katerman, David J. HalperniD, Nicholas B. DiamondiD, Michael J. KahanaiD
Abstract
BackgroundSpectral features of human electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings during learning predict subsequent recall variability. New methodCapitalizing on these fluctuating neural features, we develop a non-invasive closed-loop (NICL) system for real-time optimization of human learning. Participants play a virtual navigation and memory game; recording multi-session data across days allowed us to build participant-specific classification models of recall success. In subsequent closed-loop sessions, our platform manipulated the timing of memory encoding, selectively presenting items during periods of predicted good or poor memory function based on EEG features decoded in real time. ResultsWe observed greater memory modulation (difference between recall rates when presenting items during predicted good vs. poor learning periods) for participants with higher out-of-sample classification accuracy. Comparison with Existing MethodsThis study demonstrates greater-than-chance memory decoding from EEG recordings in a naturalistic virtual navigation task with greater real-world validity than basic word-list recall paradigms. Here we modulate memory by timing stimulus presentation based on noninvasive scalp EEG recordings, whereas prior closed-loop studies for memory improvement involved intracranial recordings and direct electrical stimulation. Other noninvasive studies have investigated the use of neurofeedback or remedial study for memory improvement. ConclusionsThese findings present a proof-of-concept for using non-invasive closed-loop technology to optimize human learning and memory through principled stimulus timing, but only in those participants for whom classifiers reliably predict out-of-sample memory function.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Field percentile
- top 40%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural correlates of memory in a naturalistic spatiotemporal context
Matthew R. Dougherty, Woohyeuk Chang, … Michael J. Kahana·Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- Targeted memory reactivation during sleep elicits neural signals related to learning content
Boyu Wang, James W. Antony, … Kenneth A. Norman·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2019
- Direct Brain Recordings Suggest a Causal Subsequent-Memory Effect
Daniel Rubinstein, Christoph T. Weidemann, … Michael J. Kahana·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2023
- A framework for closed-loop neurofeedback for real-time EEG decoding
Greta Tuckute, Sofie Therese Hansen, … Lars Kai Hansen·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2019
- Structural and Functional Connectivity Predict the Effects of Direct Brain Stimulation on Memory
Qirui Zhang, Youssef Ezzyat, … Noa Herz·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2026
- No evidence that visual impulses enhance the readout of retrieved long-term memory contents from EEG activity
Sander van Bree, Abbie Sarah Mackenzie, Maria Wimber·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024