Nature CommunicationsCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus
Rebecca WrayiD, Hania PaverdiD, Ines Prata MachadoiD, Johanna BarbieriiD, Farhana Easita, Abigail R. EdwardsiD, Ferdia Aidan GallagheriD, Iosif Alexandru MendichovszkyiD, Thomas J. MitchelliD, Maike de la RocheiD, Jacqueline D. ShieldsiD, Stephan UrsprungiD, Lauren Wallis, Anne Yvonne WarreniD, Sarah Joanne WelshiD, Mireia Crispin‐OrtuzariD, Grant Duncan StewartiD, James O. JonesiD, On behalf of the NAXIVA Study Group, Niki Couper, Lisa E. M. Hopcroft, Robert Hill, Athena Matakidou, Cara Caasi, James Watson, , Robert J. JonesiD
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Abstract
Venous tumour thrombus (VTT), where the primary tumour invades the renal vein and inferior vena cava, affects 10-15% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Curative surgery for VTT is high-risk, but neoadjuvant therapy may improve outcomes. The NAXIVA trial demonstrated a 35% VTT response rate after 8 weeks of neoadjuvant axitinib, a VEGFR-directed therapy. However, understanding non-response is critical for better treatment. We conducted a multiparametric investigation of samples collected during NAXIVA using digital pathology, flow cytometry, plasma cytokine profiling and RNA sequencing. Responders had higher baseline microvessel density and increased induction of VEGF-A and PlGF during treatment. A multi-modal machine learning model integrating features predicted response with an AUC of 0.868, improving to 0.945 when using features from week 3. Key predictive features included plasma CCL17 and IL-12. These findings may guide future treatment strategies for VTT, improving the clinical management of this challenging scenario. One Sentence SummaryA comprehensive multiparametric assessment of the effect of neoadjuvant axitinib in renal cell carcinoma patients with venous tumour thrombus was performed on tissue and peripheral blood, including an integrative machine learning model, which identified both angiogenic and immune determinants of response to therapy.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: flow cytometry
- assay: proteomics
- assay: imaging
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Baseline intratumoral TCRbeta; and TCRgamma; repertoires predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma
Manuel Pino-González, Martín Emilio Lázaro Quintela, … Mónica Martínez Fernández·medRxiv·Sep 6, 2026
- Multi-omics features-based machine learning method improve immunotherapy response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Yiqun Zhang, Zhihua Pei·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2023
- 3D vascularized microtumors unveil aberrant ccRCC vasculature and differential sensitivity to targeted treatments
Noémie Brassard-Jollive, Yoann Atlas, … Catherine Monnot·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2025
- Immune response and resistance of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients following immune checkpoint blockade.
G. Mestrallet·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2023
- Mechanistic Modeling Quantifies The Influence Of Tumor Growth Kinetics On The Response To Anti-Angiogenic Treatment
Thomas D. Gaddy, Qianhui Wu, … Stacey D. Finley·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2017
- Microenvironment of metastasis reveals key predictors of PD-1 blockade response in renal cell carcinoma
Florian Jeanneret, Pauline Bazelle, … Christophe Battail·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2023