Neuro-OncologyCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
A Multi-Omic Phenobank Reveals Axes of Glioblastoma Growth, Invasion, and Therapeutic Vulnerability
Cecilia C. KronaiD, Soumi KunduiD, Emil RoséniD, Filippa Kruse, Madeleine SkeppåsiD, Haris BabačićiD, Ida LarssoniD, Ludmila Elfineh, Maya Jeje Schuan Lü, Maria Escriva CondeiD, Ramy ElgendyiD, Zankruti DaveiD, Milena DoroszkoiD, Katrin Rut-Halldorsdottir, Xiaofang Cao, Rashmi Ramachandra, Karl Holmberg Olausson, Mats NilssoniD, Joachim WeischenfeldtiD, Johan WikströmiD, Maria PernemalmiD, Anders SundströmiD, Irem Uppman, Hitesh Bhagavanbhai MangukiyaiD, Sven NelanderiD
Abstract
BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) invasion is clinically decisive but difficult to model systematically. Existing patient-derived xenograft (PDX) resources rarely couple reproducible in vivo invasion phenotypes with matched multi-omic profiles at scale, limiting mechanistic insight and phenotype-informed therapeutic hypotheses. MethodsWe established the HGCC Phenobank, comprising 65 patient-derived GBM stem-like cultures with matched multi-omic profiling and orthotopic engraftment in 449 mice. Blinded histopathology quantified ten invasion traits per case. These phenotypes were integrated with RNA sequencing, DNA methylation, and mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Multi-Omic Factor Analysis (MOFA) identified latent molecular programs. Phenotype-specific RNA signatures were matched to LINCS drug-perturbation profiles and validated in 3D gliomasphere and ex vivo brain-slice assays. ResultsTwo dominant, reproducible invasion modes emerged across models: diffuse parenchymal infiltration and perivascular/condensed growth. Proneural cultures formed more aggressive tumors in immunodeficient mice, and mouse survival showed a modest correlation with patient survival in matched cases (Pearson r = 0.1832, p = 0.045). MOFA identified 15 latent factors; Factor 1, enriched for ASCL1/OLIG1/OLIG2 programs and associated with TP53/DCHS2/WNK2 alterations, was linked to increased tumor formation, diffuse invasion, and shorter mouse survival, and stratified GBM patients in TCGA and in our matched patient cohort. Drug-signature matching separated mechanisms targeting diffuse versus perivascular invasion. Experimental validation confirmed phenotype-selective sensitivities, and inhibitors PIK-75 and buparlisib suppressed invasion dynamics across representative models in 3D and brain-slice assays. ConclusionsThe HGCC Phenobank provides the first openly available PDX resource that systematically links GBM invasion phenotypes to multi-omic programs and therapeutic predictions. This framework enables reproducible model selection, mechanistic dissection of invasion modes, and phenotype-guided therapeutic discovery. Key PointsO_LIDiffuse and perivascular invasion define orthogonal GBM axes C_LIO_LIASCL1/OLIG factor links initiation, diffuse growth, and survival C_LIO_LIPhenotype-matched drugs validated; PIK-75 and buparlisib curb invasion dynamics C_LI Importance of the StudyGlioblastoma invasion varies substantially between patients, yet existing patient-derived xeno-graft resources rarely combine reproducible in vivo phenotyping with matched multi-omic profiling at scale. The HGCC Phenobank addresses this gap with standardized, blinded scoring of ten invasion traits across 449 orthotopic xenografts from 65 molecularly characterized GBM stem-like cultures, integrated with transcriptomic, methylomic, and proteomic data. We identify two dominant, reproducible invasion modes and a cross-modal neurodevelopmental program, the ASCL1/OLIG1/2-associated Factor 1, that links tumor initiation, diffuse growth, and survival in mice, and stratifies GBM patients in TCGA and in our matched patient cohort. In a spatially resolved xenograft section, Factor 1 signal localizes to the invasive tumor periphery. By matching phenotype-specific RNA signatures to drug-induced transcriptional responses, we show that invasion phenotypes nominate selective vulnerabilities, exemplified by PIK-75. This openly shared resource enables reproducible model selection, mechanistic dissection of invasion programs, and phenotype-guided therapeutic discovery.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: clustering
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The invasion phenotypes of glioblastoma depend on plastic and reprogrammable cell states
Milena Doroszko, Rebecka Stockgard, … Sven Nelander·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2025
- Microglial lipid signaling drives glioblastoma invasion and represents a therapeutic vulnerability
Carla Pallarés-Moratalla, Mélanie Guyot, … Gabriele Bergers·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2026
- Cleavage of the vascular matrix attracts glioblastoma cells to infiltrate the brain parenchyma
Lara Perryman, Anette M. Høye, … Janine Terra Erler·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2024
- Modeling glioblastoma invasion using human brain organoids and single-cell transcriptomics
T. G. Krieger, S. M. Tirier, … C. Conrad·bioRxiv·May 7, 2019
- Spatiotemporal modeling reveals high-resolution invasion states in glioblastoma
V. Thoppey Manoharan, A. Abdelkareem, … S. Morrissy·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2023
- Metabolic and transcriptomic profiles of glioblastoma invasion revealed by comparisons between patients and corresponding orthotopic xenografts in mice
C. Cudalbu, P. Bady, … M. E. Hegi·Acta Neuropathologica CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2021