henhaobio
Sign in

Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Identification of cell barcodes from long-read single-cell RNA-seq with BLAZE

Yupei YouiD, Yair D. J. PraweriD, Ricardo De Paoli‐IseppiiD, Cameron P. J. HuntiD, Clare L. ParishiD, Heejung ShimiD, Michael B. ClarkiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionised our ability to profile gene expression. However, short-read (SR) scRNAseq methodologies such as 10x are restricted to sequencing the 3 or 5 ends of transcripts, providing accurate gene expression but little information on the RNA isoforms expressed in each cell. Newly developed long-read (LR) scRNA-seq enables the quantification of RNA isoforms in individual cells but LR scRNA-seq using the Oxford Nanopore platform has largely relied upon matched short-read data to identify cell barcodes and allow single cell analysis. Here we introduce BLAZE (Barcode identification from long-reads for AnalyZing single-cell gene Expression), which accurately and efficiently identifies 10x cell barcodes using only nanopore LR scRNA-seq data. We compared BLAZE to existing tools, including cell barcodes identified from matched SR scRNA-seq, on differentiating stem cells and 5 cancer cell lines. BLAZE outperforms existing tools and provides a more accurate representation of the cells present in LR scRNA-seq than using matched short-reads. BLAZE provides accurate cell barcodes over a wide range of experimental read depths and sequencing accuracies, while other methodologies commonly identify false-positive barcodes and cell clusters, disrupting biological interpretation of LR scRNA-seq results. In conclusion, BLAZE eliminates the requirement for matched SR scRNA-seq to interpret LR scRNA-seq, simplifying procedures and decreasing costs while also improving LR scRNA-seq results. BLAZE is compatible with downstream tools accepting a cell barcode whitelist file and is available at https://github.com/shimlab/BLAZE.

Citations
186
FWCI
16.26
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISEbrahimi '22Wang '21Trull '25Bregman '26Hahaut '26Grabski '22
77% semantic matchBioinformatics
Ghazal Ebrahimi, Baraa Orabi, Meghan Robinson+3 more·iScience·Jun 7, 2022· 24 citations