BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data
Haoyun LeiiD, Edward Michael GertziD, Alejandro A. SchäfferiD, Xuecong FuiD, Yifeng TaoiD, Kerstin Heselmeyer‐HaddadiD, Irianna Marie TorresiD, Guibo LiiD, Liqin XuiD, Yong HouiD, Kui WuiD, Xulian Shi, Michael C. DeaniD, Thomas RiediD, Russell S. SchwartziD
Abstract
Computational reconstruction of clonal evolution in cancers has become a crucial tool for understanding how tumors initiate and progress and how this process varies across patients. The field still struggles, however, with special challenges of applying phylogenetic methods to cancers, such as the prevalence and importance of copy number alteration (CNA) and structural variation (SV) events in tumor evolution, which are difficult to profile accurately by prevailing sequencing methods in such a way that subsequent reconstruction by phylogenetic inference algorithms is accurate. In the present work, we develop computational methods to combine sequencing with multiplex interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (miFISH) to exploit the complementary advantages of each technology in inferring accurate models of clonal CNA evolution accounting for both focal changes and aneuploidy at whole-genome scales. We demonstrate on simulated data that incorporation of FISH data substantially improves accurate inference of focal CNA and ploidy changes in clonal evolution from deconvolving bulk sequence data. Analysis of real glioblastoma data for which FISH, bulk sequence, and single cell sequence are all available confirms the power of FISH to enhance accurate reconstruction of clonal copy number evolution in conjunction with bulk and optionally single-cell sequence data. Availabilitygithub.com/CMUSchwartzLab/FISH_deconvolution Contactrussells@andrew.cmu.edu
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Field percentile
- top 35%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tumor Copy Number Deconvolution Integrating Bulk and Single-Cell Sequencing Data
Haoyun Lei, Bochuan Lyu, … Russell S. Schwartz·Journal of Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- PhyClone: Accurate Bayesian reconstruction of cancer phylogenies from bulk sequencing
Emilia Hurtado, Alexandre Bouchard‐Côté, Andrew J. L. Roth·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2025
- Pharming: Joint Clonal Tree Reconstruction of SNV and CNAEvolution from Single-cell DNA Sequencing of Tumors
Leah L. Weber, Anna Hart, … Mohammed El-Kebir·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Tracing the evolution of aneuploid cancers from multiregional sequencing
Subhayan Chattopadhyay, Jenny Karlsson, … David Gisselsson·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2021
- Power and pitfalls of computational methods for inferring clone phylogenies and mutation orders from bulk sequencing data
- SiCloneFit: Bayesian inference of population structure, genotype, and phylogeny of tumor clones from single-cell genome sequencing data
Hamim Zafar, Nicholas E. Navin, … Luay K. Nakhleh·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2019