PeerJNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Corticospinal excitability remains unchanged in the presence of residual force enhancement and does not contribute to increased torque production
Jasmin Frischholz, Brent J. RaiteriiD, Andrew G. CresswelliD, Daniel HahniD
Abstract
Following active muscle stretch, muscle force is enhanced, which is known as residual force enhancement (rFE). As earlier studies found apparent corticospinal excitability modulations in the presence of rFE, this study aimed to test whether corticospinal excitability modulations contribute to rFE. Fourteen participants performed submaximal plantar flexion stretch-hold and fixed-end contractions at 30% of their maximal voluntary soleus muscle activity in a dynamometer. During the steady state of the contractions, participants either received subthreshold or suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of their motor cortex, while triceps surae muscle responses to stimulation were obtained via electromyography (EMG), and net ankle joint torque was recorded. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to confirm muscle fascicle stretch during stretch-hold contractions in a subset of participants. Following stretch of the plantar flexors, an average rFE of 7% and 11% was observed for contractions with subthreshold and suprathreshold TMS, respectively. 41-46 ms following subthreshold TMS, triceps surae muscle activity was suppressed by 19-25%, but suppression was not significantly different between stretch-hold and fixed-end contractions. Similarly, the reduction in plantar flexion torque following subthreshold TMS was not significantly different between contraction conditions. Motor evoked potentials, silent periods and superimposed twitches following suprathreshold TMS were also not significantly different between contraction conditions. As TMS of the motor cortex did not result in any differences between stretch-hold and fixed-end contractions, we conclude that rFE is not linked to changes in corticospinal excitability, making rFE a muscle mechanical property rather than a combined neuro-muscular property.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Field percentile
- 28th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability while preserving motor unit discharge properties during isometric contractions
J. C. Hernandez-Pavon, S. Avrillon, … J. L. Pons·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2022
- The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations
Lea‐Fedia Rissmann, Brent J. Raiteri, … Daniel Hahn·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025
- Rate of force development is correlated with corticospinal excitability during explosive voluntary contractions.
Federico Castelli, Omar S. Mian, … Neale Anthony Tillin·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Corticospinal, reticulospinal, and motoneuronal contributions to fatigability during a sustained contraction of the elbow flexors
Oliver Hayman, Rosiered Brownson-Smith, … Paul Ansdell·Experimental PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2025
- Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation
Baptiste M Waltzing, Marcos Moreno Verdú, … Robert M. Hardwick·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study
Maria Nazarova, Macey Higdon, … Hanna Renvall·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026