Rate of force development is correlated with corticospinal excitability during explosive voluntary contractions.
Federico CastelliiD, Omar S. MianiD, Adam Mark BrutoniD, Ashika Chembila ValappiliD, Ricci HannahiD, Neale Anthony TilliniD
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between rate of torque development (RTD) and corticospinal excitability (denoted by motor-evoked potential; MEP) during explosive voluntary contractions. Also, to assess differences in MEP and silent period duration between different phases of explosive contraction and at maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) plateau. MethodsIn 14 adults, quadriceps muscle MEP and silent period duration were measured at [~]45 (early), [~]115 (middle), and [~]190 ms (late) from EMG onset during knee-extensor isometric explosive contractions, and at MVC plateau with superimposed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). RTD was measured immediately prior to early-phase MEP during the same contractions, and these two variables were correlated across separate contractions, within participants, via repeated measures correlation (RmCorr). RTD was also measured in explosive contractions without TMS over early-, middle-, and late-phases and correlated to MEP averaged across the corresponding and preceding phases, via Pearsons r correlations, assessing relationships across participants. MEP and silent period duration were compared (ANOVA) between the different phases and at MVC plateau. ResultsMEP and RTD were correlated across separate contractions within participants (RmCorr r=0.43), and in the middle phase across participants (Pearsons r=0.56). MEP and RTD were not correlated in other phases (r[≥]0.09). Silent period duration increased throughout the different phases of contraction and up to MVC plateau (ANOVA, p=0.001) but MEP remained constant (ANOVA, p=0.42). ConclusionThe correlations between MEP and RTD suggests corticospinal excitability is an important determinant of RTD. During rapid torque development and up to MVC plateau, corticospinal inhibition increases but excitability remains constant.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Corticospinal excitability remains unchanged in the presence of residual force enhancement and does not contribute to increased torque production
Jasmin Frischholz, Brent J. Raiteri, … Daniel Hahn·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2022
- Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025
- Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation
Baptiste M Waltzing, Marcos Moreno Verdú, … Robert M. Hardwick·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults
Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, … Ian Greenhouse·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2024
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
Miles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, … Alexander Opitz·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2022
- Corticospinal, reticulospinal, and motoneuronal contributions to fatigability during a sustained contraction of the elbow flexors
Oliver Hayman, Rosiered Brownson-Smith, … Paul Ansdell·Experimental PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2025