Eco-evolutionary dynamics of defense systems in mobile genetic elements: Cui bono?
Abstract
BackgroundMobile genetic elements (MGEs), including viruses, plasmids, and transposons, are major drivers of evolution in bacteria and archaea. Host-parasite conflicts drive the emergence of a broad variety of defense and counter-defense systems. Recent advances in metagenomics and functional annotation have shown that many defense systems are located on MGEs. The fact that MGEs are, essentially, genomic parasites raises an intriguing question: why do these parasites carry defense systems at high prevalence, often even higher than the host chromosome? ResultsWe developed a simple mathematical model to investigate the factors that promote evolution of defense systems in MGEs and the ecological implications of MGE-encoded defense. Our analysis points to the strength of inter-MGE interference as a key determinant of the evolution of defense systems in MGEs. We identify two qualitatively distinct regimes, depending on the basic reproductive number in mixed coinfections. Weakly interfering MGEs tend to carry low-cost defense systems that enhance the survival of their hosts upon exposure to more damaging MGEs. Although these systems can be occasionally transferred to the host, they typically remain in MGEs. In contrast, strongly interfering MGEs, such as plasmids from the same incompatibility group, can carry high-cost defense systems that are detrimental to the host and the population as a whole, but help their carriers spread by actively replacing their competitors. ConclusionsAnalysis of our model shows that the key determinant of the evolution and spread of defense systems in MGEs is the strength of cross-MGE interference. Weakly interfering MGEs would serve as MGE banks, typically carrying low-cost defense systems that can benefit the host by protecting it from more damaging MGEs. In contrast, strongly interfering MGEs would carry costly defense systems that mediate inter-MGE conflicts but are deleterious to the host. These MGEs could serve as proving grounds for emerging defense systems, which might eventually become cost-effective once optimized by selection.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Defense systems are pervasive across chromosomally integrated mobile genetic elements and are inversely correlated to virulence and antimicrobial resistance
J. Botelho·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2022
- Co-evolutionary dynamics of defense systems and anti-defense genes in chromosomes and mobile genetic elements of Enterobacteriaceae
Yang Liu, Stephen Dela Ahator, … Jaime Iranzo·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2025
- Timescales and genetic linkage explain the variable impact of defense systems on horizontal gene transfer
Yang Liu, João Botelho, Jaime Iranzo·bioRxiv·Feb 29, 2024
- Eco-evolutionary feedbacks drive the co-occurrence of restriction-modification systems and antimicrobial resistance genes
Joseph Westley, Paritosh Bedekar, … Edze Rients Westra·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2025
- Defense systems and horizontal gene transfer in bacteria
Roman Kogay, Yuri I. Wolf, Eugene V. Koonin·Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2024
- Genetic dominance governs the evolution and spread of mobile genetic elements in bacteria
J. Rodriguez-Beltran, V. Sorum, … A. San Millan·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2019