A natural variant and an engineered mutation in a GPCR promote DEET resistance in C. elegans
Emily Jane DennisiD, May DobosiewicziD, Xin JiniD, Laura B. DuvalliD, Philip S. Hartman, Cornelia I. BargmanniD, Leslie B. VosshalliD
Abstract
DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) is a synthetic chemical, identified by the United States Department of Agriculture in 1946 in a screen for repellents to protect soldiers from mosquito-borne diseases1,2. Since its discovery, DEET has become the worlds most widely used arthropod repellent3, and is effective against invertebrates separated by millions of years of evolution, including biting flies4, honeybees5, ticks6, and land leeches4,7. In insects, DEET acts on the olfactory system5,8-14 and requires the olfactory receptor co-receptor orco9,11-13, but its specific mechanism of action remains controversial. Here we show that the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is sensitive to DEET, and use this genetically-tractable animal to study its mechanism of action. We found that DEET is not a volatile repellent, but interferes selectively with chemotaxis to a variety of attractant and repellent molecules. DEET increases pause lengths to disrupt chemotaxis to some odours but not others. In a forward genetic screen for DEET-resistant animals, we identified a single G protein-coupled receptor, str-217, which is expressed in a single pair of DEET-responsive chemosensory neurons, ADL. Misexpression of str-217 in another chemosensory neuron conferred strong responses to DEET. Both engineered str-217 mutants and a wild isolate of C. elegans carrying a deletion in str-217 are DEET-resistant. We found that DEET can interfere with behaviour by inducing an increase in average pause length during locomotion, and show that this increase in pausing requires both str-217 and ADL neurons. Finally, we demonstrated that ADL neurons are activated by DEET and that optogenetic activation of ADL increased average pause length. This is consistent with the \"confusant\" hypothesis, in which DEET is not a simple repellent but modulates multiple olfactory pathways to scramble behavioural responses12,13. Our results suggest a consistent motif for the effectiveness of DEET across widely divergent taxa: an effect on multiple chemosensory neurons to disrupt the pairing between odorant stimulus and behavioural response.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DEET feet: Aedes aegypti mosquitoes use their tarsi to sense DEET on contact
Emily Jane Dennis, Olivia V. Goldman, Leslie B. Vosshall·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2019
- DEET and other repellents are inhibitors of mosquito odorant receptors for oviposition attractants
Pingxi Xu, Fangfang Zeng, … Walter S. Leal·Insect Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2019
- Repellent compound with larger protective zone than DEET identified through activity-screening of Ir40a neurons, does not require Or function
Tom Guda, Pinky Kain, … Anandasankar Ray·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2015
- DEET as a feeding deterrent
- The C. elegans gustatory receptor homolog LITE-1 is a chemoreceptor required for diacetyl avoidance
Alan Koh, Eduard Bokman, … André EX Brown·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2025
- Distinct genetic requirements underlie LITE-1-dependent photosensation and avoidance of high concentration of diacetyl in C. elegans
Alan Koh, Changchun Chen, André EX Brown·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026