MOSAIC: A Joint Modeling Methodology for Combined Circadian and Non-Circadian Analysis of Multi-Omics Data
Hannah De los SantosiD, Kristin P. BennettiD, Jennifer HurleyiD
Abstract
MotivationCircadian rhythms are approximately 24 hour endogenous cycles that control many biological functions. To identify these rhythms, biological samples are taken over circadian time and analyzed using a single omics type, such as transcriptomics or proteomics. By comparing data from these single omics approaches, it has been shown that transcriptional rhythms are not necessarily conserved at the protein level, implying extensive circadian post-transcriptional regulation. However, as proteomics methods are known to be noisier than transcriptomic methods, this suggests that previously identified arrhythmic proteins with rhythmic transcripts could have been missed due to noise and may not be due to post-transcriptional regulation. ResultsTo determine if one can use information from less-noisy transcriptomic data to inform rhythms in more-noisy proteomic data, and thus more accurately identify rhythms in the proteome, we have created the MOSAIC (Multi-Omics Selection with Amplitude Independent Criteria) application. MOSAIC combines model selection and joint modeling of multiple omics types to recover significant circadian and non-circadian trends. Using both synthetic data and proteomic data from Neurospora crassa, we showed that MOSAIC accurately recovers circadian rhythms at higher rates in not only the proteome but the transcriptome as well, outperforming existing methods for rhythm identification. In addition, by quantifying non-circadian trends in addition to circadian trends in data, our methodology allowed for the recognition of the diversity of circadian regulation as compared to non-circadian regulation. AvailabilityMOSAICs full interface is available at https://github.com/delosh653/MOSAIC. Contacthurlej2@rpi.edu Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available.at Bioinformatics online.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Field percentile
- top 26%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The PAICE Suite Reveals Circadian Post-Transcriptional Timing of Non-Coding RNAs and Spliceosome Components in Mus musculus Macrophages
Sharleen M. Buel, Shayom Debopadhaya, … Jennifer Hurley·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2022
- Circadian Oscillation Detection Analysis and Comparison (CODAC): a Multicriteria Method to Estimate and Compare Rhythmicity
Thiago Parente da Silveira, Karla Lincoln, … Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Circadian proteomics reveal rampant tuning of post-transcriptional apparatus by Chlamydomonas clock
D. B. Jadhav, S. Roy·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2023
- TimeCycle: Topology Inspired MEthod for the Detection of Cycling Transcripts in Circadian Time-Series Data
Elan Ness-Cohn, Rosemary Braun·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2021
- Dual-Approach Co-expression Analysis Framework (D-CAF) Enables Identification of Novel Circadian Regulation From Multi-OmicTimeseries Data
Joshua Chuah, Carmalena V. Cordi, … Jennifer Hurley·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2025
- Experimental Design and Power Calculation in Omics Circadian Rhythmicity Detection
Wei Zong, Marianne L. Seney, … Zhiguang Huo·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2022