Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults
Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, Mitchell Grant Fisher, Corey George WadsleyiD, Ian GreenhouseiD
Abstract
Human corticospinal excitability modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting corticospinal excitability. Whether individuals are able to return corticospinal excitability to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-six healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: 1) intertrial intervals of a choice-reaction time task, and 2) outside the task. In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal output. We hypothesized resting state excitability would be greater during intertrial intervals than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task intertrial intervals, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- top 47%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Response preparation involves a release of intracortical inhibition in task-irrelevant muscles
Isaac N. Gomez, Kara Ormiston, Ian Greenhouse·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2020
- Repetitive suprathreshold paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation alters corticospinal excitability
Suraj Suresh, Wei‐Yeh Liao, … Nigel C. Rogasch·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Transient effects in corticospinal and reticulospinal tract excitability induced by motor skill and isometric resistance training
Rachel Hawthorn, Natalie Phelps, … Ismael Seáñez·Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2025
- Opposing modulation of cortical and corticospinal excitability across movement-related beta stages
Marten Nuyts, Hartwig Roman Siebner, … Sybren Van Hoornweder·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026
- Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation
Baptiste M Waltzing, Marcos Moreno Verdú, … Robert M. Hardwick·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025