Performance Test of the QNome Nanopore Sequencer

Abstract

Nanopore sequencers have the potential to liberate DNA sequencing from centralized core facilities to distributed analytical nodes. Until now, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has been the sole manufacturer of a portable nanopore sequencer, but analogous platforms are in production. Nanopore sequencers from Qitan Technology (QT) are widely used in China but have been unavailable outside that nation and lack independent performance testing. Enabled by early access to QTs least expensive sequencer and flow cell, the QNome-3841 and QCell-384, we tested whether they could generate accurate DNA barcodes cost-effectively. In several tests involving amplicon pools from 95 to 9,120 specimens, QT recovered valid DNA barcodes from nearly as many specimens (98%) as ONT. QT sequences had slightly lower fidelity than their ONT counterparts and QT frequently failed to resolve the correct length of G/C homopolymers. However, barcode sequences from the two platforms were nearly indistinguishable after bioinformatic treatment. QTs wash kit performed well, enabling a QCell to sequence eight amplicon pools with zero carryover between runs and minimal degradation of the flow cell. Its ultra-fast protocol allowed library preparation in a single step that could be completed in 15 minutes, but this came at the cost of lower quality data. Once widely available, QT devices will be well-suited for supporting DNA barcode analysis.