Material Composition and Implantation Site Affect in vivo Device Degradation Rate

Successful tissue engineering requires biomedical devices that initially stabilize wounds, then degrade as tissue is regenerated. However, the material degradation rates reported in literature are often conflicting. Incorporation of in situ monitoring functionality into implanted devices would allow real time assessment of degradation and potential failure. This necessitates introduction of contrast agent as most biomedical devices are composed of polymeric materials with no inherent contrast in medical imaging modalities. In the present study, computed tomography (CT)-visible radiopaque composites were created by adding 5-20wt% tantalum oxide (TaOx) nanoparticles into polymers with distinct degradation profiles: polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) 85:15 and PLGA 50:50, representing slow, medium and fast degrading materials respectively. Radiopaque phantoms, mimicking porous tissue engineering devices, were implanted into mice intramuscularly or intraperitoneally, and monitored via CT over 20 weeks. Changes in phantom volume, including collapse and swelling, were visualized over time. Phantom degradation profile was determined by polymer matrix, regardless of nanoparticle addition and foreign body response was dictated by the implant site. In addition, degradation kinetics were significantly affected in mid-degrading materials, transitioning from linear degradation intramuscularly to exponential degradation intraperitoneally, due to differences in inflammatory responses and fluid flow. Nanoparticle excretion from degraded phantoms lagged behind polymer, and future studies will modulate nanoparticle clearance. Utilizing in situ monitoring, this study seeks to unify literature and facilitate better tissue engineering devices, by highlighting the relative effect of composition and implant site on important materials properties.