Somatic variant detection in normal tissues from single-cell sequencing data
Rui Luo, Ziyi Wang, Jinzhuang DouiD, Sravya Venkata BhamidipatiiD, Divya KalraiD, Christopher M. GrochowskiiD, HarshaVardhan DoddapaneniiD, Richard A. GibbsiD, Ken CheniD, Rui CheniD, the Somatic Mosaicism across Human Tissues Network
Abstract
A crucial advantage of single-cell sequencing (SCS) is its ability to identify somatic variants in individual cells, enabling phylogenetic analysis of cellular populations within bulk tissues. While identifying somatic variants in tumor tissues via SCS has become a common practice, doing so in normal tissues remains challenging due to the rarity of somatic variants in normal cells. To evaluate the feasibility of somatic variant calling from widely available single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) and single-nucleus ATAC-seq (snATAC-seq) data, we profiled a Cell-line mix of six HapMap samples prepared by the SMaHT consortium using 10x Genomics 5 snRNA-seq (12k cells with 36k mean reads per cell) and snATAC-seq (11k cells with 14k median high-quality fragments per cell) for variant calling. PacBio long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data (109x) generated from individual cell lines were used as ground truth. Two computational tools, Monopogen and SComatic, were used for somatic variant calling from the SCS data. Monopogen achieved single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection accuracies of 93.30% in the snRNA-seq and 99.64% in the snATAC-seq data, both of which outperformed SComatic (74.35% and 94.29%, respectively). Monopogen also consistently detected somatic SNVs at cellular fractions as low as 0.5% (2.54% in snRNA and 0.81% in snATAC) in individual samples. Notably, snATAC-seq exhibited higher genomic coverage breadth and larger number of variants detected than snRNA-seq. While the SCS data have lower overall genome coverage than that of the bulk WGS, the single-cell level variant resolution allows Monopogen to assign variants to their cells of origin with over 80% accuracy in both RNA and ATAC modalities, thereby facilitating studies of clonal evolution and cell-type-specific mutagenesis. Other benchmarking methods were also evaluated (DeepVariant, Cellsnp-lite and Mutect2) for comparison. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the feasibility of performing reliable single-cell somatic mutation calling in a cell-line mixture and discussed the strengths and limitations of current computational methods when applied to normal tissues.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accurate de novo detection of somatic mutations in high-throughput single-cell profiling data sets
Francesc Muyas, Ruoyan Li, … Isidro Cortés‐Ciriano·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2022
- De novo detection of somatic variants in high-quality long-read single-cell RNA sequencing data
Arthur Dondi, Nico Borgsmüller, … Niko Beerenwinkel·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2024
- Improved SNV discovery in barcode-stratified scRNA-seq alignments
N. M. Prashant, Hongyu Liu, … Anélia Horvath·GenesPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2021
- Identifying cancer cells from calling single-nucleotide variants in scRNA-seq data
Valérie Marot-Lassauzaie, Sergi Beneyto‐Calabuig, … Laleh Haghverdi·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2024
- SCANBIT facilitates identification of tumor cell populations in scRNAseq data using pseudobulked SNV calls
Matthew V. Cannon, Matthew J. Gust, … Ryan David Roberts·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2026
- Monopogen: single nucleotide variant calling from single cell sequencing
Jinzhuang Dou, Yukun Tan, … Ken Chen·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2022