From Planning Stage To FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists
Lea SeepiD, Stephan GreiniD, Iva ŠplíchalováiD, Danli Ran, Mickel Mikhael, Staffan HildebrandiD, Mario A. R. LauterbachiD, Karsten HilleriD, Dalila Juliana Silva RibeiroiD, Katharina SieckmanniD, Ronja KardinaliD, Hao HuangiD, Jiangyan YuiD, Sebastian KallabisiD, Janina BehrensiD, Andreas TilliD, Viktoriya PeevaiD, Akim StrohmeyeriD, Johanna BruderiD, Tobias BlumiD, Ana Soriano‐ArroquiaiD, Dominik TischeriD, Katharina KuellmeriD, Yuanfang Li, Marc BeyeriD, , Jan HasenaueriD
Abstract
Datasets consist of measurement data and metadata. Metadata provides context, essential for understanding and (re-)using data. Various metadata standards exist for different methods, systems and contexts. However, relevant information resides at differing stages across the data-lifecycle. Often, this information is defined and standardized only at publication stage, which can lead to data loss and workload increase. In this study, we developed Metadatasheet, a metadata standard based on interviews with members of two biomedical consortia and systematic screening of data repositories. It aligns with the data-lifecycle allowing synchronous metadata recording within Microsoft Excel, a widespread data recording software. Additionally, we provide an implementation, the Metadata Workbook, that offers user-friendly features like automation, dynamic adaption, metadata integrity checks, and export options for various metadata standards. By design and due to its extensive documentation, the proposed metadata standard simplifies recording and structuring of metadata for biomedical scientists, promoting practicality and convenience in data management. This framework can accelerate scientific progress by enhancing collaboration and knowledge transfer throughout the intermediate steps of data creation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- FAIR Data Station for Lightweight Metadata Management & Validation of Omics Studies
Bart Nijsse, Peter J. Schaap, Jasper J. Koehorst·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2022
- BioSharing: Harnessing Metadata Standards For The Data Commons
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, … Milo Thurston·bioRxiv·May 31, 2017
- FRED: a universal tool to generate FAIR metadata for omics experiments
Jasmin Walter, Carsten Tobias Kuenne, … Mario Looso·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2026
- The FAIR Data Point Populator: collaborative FAIRification and population of FAIR Data Points
Daphne Wijnbergen, Rajaram Kaliyaperumal, … Eleni Mina·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingPeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2025
- The HuBMAP Framework for Advancing Data FAIRness
Stephen A. Fisher, Josef Hardi, … Mark A. Musen·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2026
- Current challenges in microbiome metadata collection
G. Rosenfeld, A. Angelova, … D. Hurt·bioRxiv·May 5, 2021