Sign in
BioinformaticsComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Peer-reviewed journal article

MOSGA 2: Comparative genomics and validation tools

Roman MartiniD, Hagen DreßleriD, Georges HattabiD, Thomas HackliD, Matthias FischeriD, Dominik HeideriD

Abstract

Due to the highly growing number of available genomic information, the need for accessible and easy-to-use analysis tools is increasing. To facilitate eukaryotic genome annotations, we created MOSGA. In this work, we show how MOSGA 2 is developed by including several advanced analyses for genomic data. Since the genomic data quality greatly impacts the annotation quality, we included multiple tools to validate and ensure high-quality user-submitted genome assemblies. Moreover, thanks to the integration of comparative genomics methods, users can benefit from a broader genomic view by analyzing multiple genomic data sets simultaneously. Further, we demonstrate the new functionalities of MOSGA 2 by different use-cases and practical examples. MOSGA 2 extends the already established application to the quality control of the genomic data and inte-grates and analyzes multiple genomes in a larger context, e.g., by phylogenetics.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWorkum '26Madoui '16Manchanda '20Hill '25Wyatt '26Kobel '25
55% semantic matchBioinformatics
Dirk‐Jan M. van Workum, Kuntal Kumar Dey, Alexander Kozik+5 more·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics·Jan 6, 2026· 1 citations