Nucleic Acids ResearchMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Comparison of cell response to chromatin and DNA damage
Artyom Luzhin, Priyanka RajaniD, Alfiya F. SafinaiD, Katerina I. LeonovaiD, Aimee B. StablewskiiD, Jianmin WangiD, Denisha L. RobinsoniD, Natalia Isaeva, Omar L. KantidzeiD, Katerina V. GurovaiD
Abstract
DNA-targeting drugs may damage DNA or chromatin. Many anti-cancer drugs damage both, making it difficult to understand their mechanisms of action. Using molecules causing DNA breaks without altering nucleosome structure (bleomycin) or destabilizing nucleosomes without damaging DNA (curaxin), we investigated the consequences of DNA or chromatin damage in normal and tumor cells. As expected, DNA damage caused p53-dependent growth arrest followed by senescence. Chromatin damage caused higher p53 accumulation than DNA damage; however, growth arrest was p53-independent and did not result in senescence. Chromatin damage activated the transcription of multiple genes, including classical p53 targets, in a p53-independent manner. Although these genes were not highly expressed in basal conditions, they had chromatin organization around the transcription start sites (TSS) characteristic of most highly expressed genes and the highest level of paused RNA polymerase. We hypothesized that nucleosomes around the TSS of these genes were the most sensitive to chromatin damage. Therefore, nucleosome loss upon curaxin treatment would enable transcription without the assistance of sequence-specific transcription factors. We confirmed this hypothesis by showing greater nucleosome loss around the TSS of these genes upon curaxin treatment and activation of a p53-specific reporter in p53-null cells by chromatin-damaging agents but not DNA-damaging agents.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Targeting Noncanonical TEAD Axis to Overcome DNA Repair-Driven Chemoresistance
Dong-Hyeon Kim, Jongwan Kim, … Hak Park·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2026
- Comparison of genotoxic vs. non-genotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
Allison N. Catizone, Charly Ryan Good, … Morgan A. Sammons·Cell CyclePeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2019
- Heterogeneous transcriptome response to DNA damage at single cell resolution.
S. R. Park, S. Namkoong, … J. H. Lee·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2019
- The chromatin associated Sin3B is a critical regulator of DNA damage repair through the engagement of the Non-Homologous End Joining.
J. Morales-Valencia, A. Calderon, … G. David·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2022
- Hyperactive end joining repair mediates resistance to DNA damaging therapy in p53-deficient cells
R. J. Kumar, H. X. Chao, … G. P. Gupta·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2020
- Long-term mitotic DNA damage promotes chromokinesin-mediated missegregation of polar chromosomes in cancer cells
M. Novais-Cruz, A. Pombinho, … C. Ferras·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2022