BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
interpolatedXY: a two-step strategy to normalise DNA methylation microarray data avoiding sex bias
Yucheng WangiD, T.J. Gorrie-StoneiD, Olivia A. GrantiD, Alexandria AndrayasiD, Xiaojun ZhaiiD, Klaus Dieter McDonald-MaieriD, Leonard C. SchalkwykiD
Abstract
MotivationData normalization is an essential step to reduce technical variation within and between arrays. Due to the different karyotypes and the effects of X chromosome inactivation, females and males exhibit distinct methylation patterns on sex chromosomes, thus it poses a significant challenge to normalise sex chromosome data without introducing bias. Currently, existing methods do not provide unbiased solutions to normalise sex chromosome data, usually, they just process autosomal and sex chromosomes indiscriminately. ResultsHere, we demonstrate that ignoring this sex difference will lead to introducing artificial sex bias, especially for thousands of autosomal CpGs. We present a novel two-step strategy (interpolatedXY) to address this issue, which is applicable to all quantile-based normalisation methods. By this new strategy, the autosomal CpGs are first normalised independently by conventional methods, such as funnorm or dasen; then the corrected methylation values of sex chromosome linked CpGs are estimated as the weighted average of their nearest neighbours on autosomes. The proposed two-step strategy can also be applied to other non-quantile-based normalisation methods, as well as other array-based data types. Moreover, we propose a useful concept: the sex explained fraction of variance, to quantitatively measure the normalisation effect. AvailabilityThe proposed methods are available by calling the function adjustedDasen or adjustedFunnorm in the latest wateRmelon package (https://github.com/schalkwyk/wateRmelon), with methods compatible with all the major workflows, including minfi. Contactxzhai@essex.ac.uk; lschal@essex.ac.uk Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at...
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA methylation-based sex classifier to predict sex and identify sex chromosome aneuploidy
Yucheng Wang, Eilis J. Hannon, … Leonard C. Schalkwyk·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2021
- DNA methylation differences between the female and male X chromosomes in human brain
Robert Morgan, Eddie Loh, … Soojin V. Yi·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2024
- Dosage compensation and sexual conflict in female heterogametic methylomes
Marianthi Tangili, Joanna Sudyka, … Simon Verhulst·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2024
- Identifying, understanding, and correcting technical biases on the sex chromosomes in next-generation sequencing data
Timothy H. Webster, Madeline Couse, … Melissa A. Wilson·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- Functional normalization of 450k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies
Jean-Philippe Fortin, Aurelie Labbe, … Kasper D. Hansen·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2014
- The X-factor in ART: does the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies influence DNA methylation on the X chromosome?
Julia Romanowska, Haakon E. Nustad, … Astanand Jugessur·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2022