Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity
Siawoosh MohammadiiD, Tobias Streubel, Leonie Klock, Luke EdwardsiD, Antoine LuttiiD, Kerrin PineiD, Sandra Weber, Patrick ScheibeiD, Gabriel ZiegleriD, Jürgen GallinatiD, Simone KühniD, Martina F. CallaghaniD, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Karsten TabelowiD
Abstract
Multi-Parameter Mapping (MPM) is a comprehensive quantitative neuroimaging protocol that enables estimation of four physical parameters (longitudinal and effective transverse relaxation rates R1 and [Formula], proton density PD, and magnetization transfer saturation MTsat) that are sensitive to microstructural tissue properties such as iron and myelin content. Their capability to reveal microstructural brain differences, however, is tightly bound to controlling random noise and artefacts (e.g. caused by head motion) in the signal. Here, we introduced a method to estimate the local error of PD, R1 and MTsat maps that captures both noise and artefacts on a routine basis without requiring additional data. To investigate the methods sensitivity to random noise, we calculated the model-based signal-to-noise ratio (mSNR) and showed in measurements and simulations that it correlated linearly with an experimental raw-image-based SNR map. We found that the mSNR varied with MPM protocols, magnetic field strength (3T vs. 7T) and MPM parameters: it halved from PD to R1 and decreased from PD to MTsat by a factor of 3-4. Exploring the artefact-sensitivity of the error maps, we generated robust MPM parameters using two successive acquisitions of each contrast and the acquisition-specific errors to down-weight erroneous regions. The resulting robust MPM parameters showed reduced variability at the group level as compared to their single-repeat or averaged counterparts. The error and mSNR maps may better inform power-calculations by accounting for local data quality variations across measurements. Code to compute the mSNR maps and robustly combined MPM maps is available in the open-source hMRI toolbox.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Field percentile
- top 32%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for MT and PD but attenuated for R1 and R2* in healthy young adults
Elisabeth Wenger, Sarah E. Polk, … Andreas M. Brandmaier·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2021
- Multi-echo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: How to Combine Echoes for Accuracy and Precision at 3 T
Emma Biondetti, Anita Karsa, … Karin Shmueli·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2022
- Multi-parametric ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging for myelination in the developing mouse brain
Choong H. Lee, Jennifer A. Minteer, … Jiangyang Zhang·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- Quality Assurance Strategies for Brain State Characterization by MEMRI
Taylor W. Uselman, Russell E. Jacobs, Elaine L. Bearer·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2026
- Multi-parametric MRI can detect enhanced myelination in the Gli1-/- mouse brain
Choong H. Lee, Mara Holloman, … Jiangyang Zhang·NMR in BiomedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2025
- Inter-user comparison for quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxides with magnetic particle imaging across two institutions highlights a need for standardized approaches
H. J. Good, O. C. Sehl, … P. J. Foster·Molecular Imaging and BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023