Distinguishing pedigree relationships using multi-way identical by descent sharing and sex-specific genetic maps
Ying QiaoiD, Jens SannerudiD, Sayantani Basu-Roy, Caroline HaywardiD, Amy L. WilliamsiD
Abstract
The proportion of samples with one or more close relatives in a genetic dataset increases rapidly with sample size, necessitating relatedness modeling and enabling pedigree-based analyses. Despite this, relatives are generally unreported and current inference methods typically detect only the degree of relatedness of sample pairs and not pedigree relationships. We developed CREST, an accurate and fast method that identifies the pedigree relationships of close relatives. CREST utilizes identical by descent (IBD) segments shared between a pair of samples and their mutual relatives, leveraging the fact that sharing rates among these individuals differ across pedigree configurations. Furthermore, CREST exploits the profound differences in sex-specific genetic maps to classify pairs as maternally or paternally related--e.g., paternal half-siblings--using the locations of autosomal IBD segments shared between the pair. In simulated data, CREST correctly classifies 91.5-99.5% of grandparent-grandchild (GP) pairs, 70.5-97.0% of avuncular (AV) pairs, and 79.0-98.0% of half-siblings (HS) pairs compared to PADREs rates of 38.5-76.0% of GP, 60.5-92.0% of AV, 73.0-95.0% of HS pairs. Turning to the real 20,032 sample Generation Scotland (GS) dataset, CREST correctly determines the relationship of 99.0% of GP, 85.7% of AV, and 95.0% of HS pairs that have sufficient mutual relative data, completing this analysis in 10.1 CPU hours including IBD detection. CRESTs maternal and paternal relationship inference is also accurate, as it flagged five pairs as incorrectly labeled in the GS pedigrees-- three of which we confirmed as mistakes, and two with an uncertain relationship--yielding 99.7% of HS and 93.5% of GP pairs correctly classified.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inferring identical by descent sharing of sample ancestors promotes high resolution relative detection
Monica D. Ramstetter, Sushila A. Shenoy, … Amy L. Williams·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2018
- The rate of identical-by-descent segment sharing between close and distant relatives
Amy L. Williams·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2026
- A performance assessment of relatedness inference methods using genome-wide data from thousands of relatives
Monica D. Ramstetter, Thomas D. Dyer, … Amy L. Williams·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2017
- Crossover interference and sex-specific genetic maps shape identical by descent sharing in close relatives
Madison Caballero, Daniel N. Seidman, … Amy L. Williams·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2019
- Near perfect identification of half sibling versus niece/nephew avuncular pairs without pedigree information or genotyped relatives
Emmanuel Sapin, Kristen M. Kelly, Matthew C. Keller·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2026
- Simulating pedigrees ascertained on the basis of observed IBD sharing
Ethan M. Jewett·bioRxiv·May 13, 2024