Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicineGenetics in Medicine
Peer-reviewed journal article

A Literature Review and Pooled Case Analysis of Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome to Estimate Cancer Risk

Jazmyn L. BessiD, Toniya BrowniD, Sonia Bhala, Anaqa Faizer, Muzzammil AhmadzadaiD, Alicia A. LivinskiiD, Alex Pemov, Jung KimiD, Philip S. RosenbergiD, Gina M. NeyiD, Douglas R. StewartiD

Abstract

BackgroundCardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC) is a rare disorder with multiple congenital anomalies including macrocephaly, failure to thrive, and neurocognitive delay. CFC is part "RASopathy" syndromes caused by pathogenic germline variants in BRAF, KRAS, MAP2K1, and MAP2K2. To estimate cancer risk in CFC we conducted a systematic review using case reports and series. MethodsWe reviewed articles and abstracted CFC cases to form a retrospective cohort based on PRISMA guidelines. Genotype-pphenotype (cancer) correlations, standardized incidence ratios (SIR), cumulative incidence and cause-specific hazard rates for cancer and cancer-free in CFC were calculated. ResultsThis study includes 198 publications reporting 690 patients. Only 1.6% (11) had cancer, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Six cancer patients harbored pathogenic variants within BRAF, MAP2K1, and MAP2K2. Cumulative incidence by age 10 was 5% for cancer or cancer-free death. Hazard Ratio (death) was 1-2% until age 3 and declined thereafter. Significant SIRs were found for all sites (SIR=4.96) and ALL (SIR=24.23). ConclusionsThis is the largest investigation of cancer in CFC to date. Cancer risk in the CFC population is elevated but appears limited to earlier childhood. Modest case and cancer numbers could pose limitations to accurately assess cancer risk in CFC and more studies are needed. Systematic Review RegistrationThe review was registered using PROSPERO under the identification tag CRD42023405823 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=405823)

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
3
FWCI
0.90
Field percentile
top 32%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.