Simultaneous multi-transient linear-combination modeling of MRS data improves uncertainty estimation
Helge J. ZöllneriD, Christopher W. Davies‐JenkinsiD, Dunja SimičićiD, Assaf TaliD, Jeremias SulamiD, Georg OeltzschneriD
Abstract
PurposeThe interest in applying and modeling dynamic MRS has recently grown. 2D modeling yields advantages for the precision of metabolite estimation in interrelated MRS data. However, it is unknown whether including all transients simultaneously in a 2D model without averaging (presuming a stable signal) performs similarly to 1D modeling of the averaged spectrum. Therefore, we systematically investigated the accuracy, precision, and uncertainty estimation of both described model approaches. MethodsMonte Carlo simulations of synthetic MRS data were used to compare the accuracy and uncertainty estimation of simultaneous 2D multi-transient LCM with 1D-LCM of the average. 2,500 datasets per condition with different noise representations of a 64-transient MRS experiment at 6 signal-to-noise levels for two separate spin systems (scyllo-inositol and GABA) were analyzed. Additional datasets with different levels of noise correlation were also analyzed. Modeling accuracy was assessed by determining the relative bias of the estimated amplitudes against the ground truth, and modeling precision was determined by standard deviations and Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLB). ResultsAmplitude estimates for 1D- and 2D-LCM agreed well and showed similar level of bias compared to the ground truth. Estimated CRLBs agreed well between both models and with ground truth CRLBs. For correlated noise the estimated CRLBs increased with the correlation strength for the 1D-LCM but remained stable for the 2D-LCM. ConclusionOur results indicate that the model performance of 2D multi-transient LCM is similar to averaged 1D-LCM. This validation on a simplified scenario serves as necessary basis for further applications of 2D modeling.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Model-based frequency-and-phase correction of 1H MRS data with 2D linear-combination modeling.
Dunja Simičić, Helge J. Zöllner, … Georg Oeltzschner·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2024
- The Future is 2D: Spectral-Temporal Fitting of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data Provides Exponential Gains in Precision Over Conventional Approaches
A. Tal·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2022
- Uncertainty in denoising of MRSI using low-rank methods
William T. Clarke, Mark Chiew·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2021
- Cohort-mean measured macromolecules lead to more robust linear-combination modeling than subject-specific or parameterized ones
Helge J. Zöllner, Christopher W. Davies‐Jenkins, … Georg Oeltzschner·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2022
- The intra-individual reliability of 1H-MRS measurement in the anterior cingulate cortex across one year
Mengyun Wang, Max Korbmacher, … Karsten Specht·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2023
- Test-retest reproducibility of human brain multi-slice 1H FID-MRSI data at 9.4 T after optimization of lipid regularization, macromolecular model and spline baseline stiffness
Theresia Ziegs, Andrew Martin Wright, A Henning·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022