bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Model-based frequency-and-phase correction of 1H MRS data with 2D linear-combination modeling.
Dunja SimičićiD, Helge J. ZöllneriD, Christopher W. Davies‐JenkinsiD, Kathleen E. HupfeldiD, Richard A.E. EddeniD, Georg OeltzschneriD
Abstract
PurposeRetrospective frequency-and-phase correction (FPC) methods attempt to remove frequency- and-phase variations between transients to improve the quality of the averaged MR spectrum. However, traditional FPC methods like spectral registration struggle at low SNR. Here, we propose a method that directly integrates FPC into a two-dimensional linear-combination model (2D-LCM) of individual transients ( model-based FPC). We investigated how model-based FPC performs compared to the traditional approach, i.e., spectral registration followed by 1D-LCM in estimating frequency-and-phase drifts and, consequentially, metabolite level estimates. MethodsWe created synthetic in-vivo-like 64-transient short-TE sLASER datasets with 100 noise realizations at 5 SNR levels and added randomly sampled frequency and phase variations. We then used this synthetic dataset to compare the performance of 2D-LCM with the traditional approach (spectral registration, averaging, then 1D-LCM). Outcome measures were the frequency/phase/amplitude errors, the standard deviation of those ground-truth errors, and amplitude Cramer Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs). We further tested the proposed method on publicly available in-vivo short-TE PRESS data. Results2D-LCM estimates (and accounts for) frequency-and-phase variations directly from uncorrected data with equivalent or better fidelity than the conventional approach. Furthermore, 2D-LCM metabolite amplitude estimates were at least as accurate, precise, and certain as the conventionally derived estimates. 2D-LCM estimation of frequency and phase correction and amplitudes performed substantially better at low-to-very-low SNR. ConclusionModel-based FPC with 2D linear-combination modeling is feasible and has great potential to improve metabolite level estimation for conventional and dynamic MRS data, especially for low-SNR conditions, e.g., long TEs or strong diffusion weighting.
- assay: multiome
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Model-Informed Unsupervised Deep Learning Approaches to Frequency and Phase Correction of MRS Signals
Amirmohammad Shamaei, Jana Starčuková, … Zenon Starčuk·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2022
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Frequency and Phase Correction Using Convolutional Neural Networks
David J. Ma, Hortense Le, … Jia Guo·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2021
- Simultaneous multi-transient linear-combination modeling of MRS data improves uncertainty estimation
Helge J. Zöllner, Christopher W. Davies‐Jenkins, … Georg Oeltzschner·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2024
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Spectral Registration Using Deep Learning
David J. Ma, Yanting Yang, … Jia Guo·Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2023
- Evaluations of retrospective frequency and phase correction methods for single-voxel MR spectroscopy at 7T
Chu‐Yu Lee, Jia Xu, … Vincent A. Magnotta·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Towards harmonized spectral quantification in MRSI: Comparative analysis of Backward-Linear-Predicted and original 1H-FID-MRSI dephased data
Alessio Siviglia, Brayan Alves, … Bernard Lanz·Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 14, 2026