bioRxivBioinformatics
Genome-wide comparative analysis reveals human- mouse regulatory landscape and evolution
Olgert Denas, Richard Sandstrom, Yong ChengiD, Kathryn Beal, Javier Herrero, Ross Hardison, James TayloriD
Abstract
BackgroundBecause species-specific gene expression is driven by species-specific regulation, understanding the relationship between sequence and function of the regulatory regions in different species will help elucidate how differences among species arise. Despite active experimental and computational research, the relationships among sequence, conservation, and function are still poorly understood.\n\nResultsWe compared transcription factor occupied segments (TFos) for 116 human and 35 mouse TFs in 546 human and 125 mouse cell types and tissues from the Human and the Mouse ENCODE projects. We based the map between human and mouse TFos on a one-to-one nucleotide cross-species mapper, bnMapper, that utilizes whole genome alignments (WGA).\n\nOur analysis shows that TFos are under evolutionary constraint, but a substantial portion (25.1% of mouse and 25.85% of human on average) of the TFos does not have a homologous sequence on the other species; this portion varies among cell types and TFs. Furthermore, 47.67% and 57.01% of the homologous TFos sequence shows binding activity on the other species for human and mouse respectively. However, 79.87% and 69.22% is repurposed such that it binds the same TF in different cells or different TFs in the same cells. Remarkably, within the set of TFos not showing conservation of occupancy, the corresponding genome regions in the other species are preferred locations of novel TFos. These events suggest that a substantial amount of functional regulatory sequences is exapted from other biochemically active genomic material.\n\nDespite substantial repurposing of TFos, we did not find substantial changes in their predicted target genes, suggesting that CRMs buffer evolutionary events allowing little or no change in the TF - target gene associations. Thus, the small portion of TFos with strictly conserved occupancy underestimates the degree of conservation of regulatory interactions.\n\nConclusionWe mapped regulatory sequences from an extensive number of TFs and cell types between human and mouse. A comparative analysis of this correspondence unveiled the extent of the shared regulatory sequence across TFs and cell types under study. Importantly, a large part of the shared regulatory sequence repurposed on the other species. This sequence, fueled by turnover events, provides a strong case for exaptation in regulatory elements.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: comparative / phylogenetic analysis
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcription factor co-binding patterns drive conserved regulatory outcomes
Adam G. Diehl, Alan P. Boyle·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2018
- A map of cis-regulatory modules and constituent transcription factor binding sites in 80% of the mouse genome
Pengyu Ni, David Wilson, Zhengchang Su·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2022
- The Transcription Factor Binding Landscape of Mouse Development
Anna Nordin, Gianluca Zambanini, … Claudio Cantù·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2024
- Regulatory Transposable Elements in the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements
Alan Y. Du, Jason D. Chobirko, … Ting Wang·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2024
- Global reference mapping and dynamics of human transcription factor footprints
Jeff D. Vierstra, John E. Lazar, … John A. Stamatoyannopoulos·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020
- Transfer of regulatory knowledge from human to mouse for functional genomic analysis
Christian H. Holland, Bence Szalai, Julio Sáez-Rodríguez·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory MechanismsPeer-reviewed·Sep 13, 2019