European Vintage tomatoes galore: a result of farmers combinatorial assorting/swapping of a few diversity rich loci
J. Blanca, C. Pons, J. Montero-Pau, D. Sanchez-Matarredona, P. Ziarsolo, L. Fontanet, J. Fisher, M. Plazas, J. Casals, J. L. Rambla, A. Riccini, S. Pombarelli, A. Ruggiero, M. Sulli, S. Grillo, A. K. Kanellis, G. Giuliano, R. Finkers, M. Cammareri, S. Grandillo, A. Mazzucato, M. Causse, M. J. Diez, J. Prohens, D. Zamir, , A. Granell
Abstract
A comprehensive collection of 1,254 tomato accessions corresponding to European heirlooms and landraces, together with modern varieties, early domesticates and wild relatives, were analyzed by genotyping by sequencing. A continuous genetic gradient between the vintage and modern varieties was observed. European vintage tomatoes displayed very low genetic diversity, with only 298 loci out of 64,943 variants being polymorphic at the 95% threshold. European vintage tomatoes could be classified in several genetic groups. Two main clusters consisting of Spanish and Italian accessions showed a higher genetic diversity than the rest varieties, suggesting that these regions might be independent secondary centers of diversity and with a different history. Other varieties seem to be the result of a more recent complex pattern of migrations and hybridizations among the European regions. Several polymorphic loci were associated in a GWAS with fruit morphological traits in the European vintage collection, and the corresponding alleles were found to contribute to the distinctive phenotypic characteristic of the genetic varietal groups. The few highly polymorphic loci associated with morphological traits in an otherwise diversity-poor genome suggests a history of balancing selection, in which tomato farmers maintained the morphological variation by applying a high selective pressure within different varietal types. HighlightThe high phenotypic diversity observed among European vintage varieties was created by traditional farmers by combining very few polymorphic loci subjected to balancing selection.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The evolutionary dynamics of genetic mutational load throughout tomato domestication history
Hamid Razifard, Sofia Visa, … Ana L. Caicedo·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2025
- The impact of transposable elements on tomato diversity
M. Dominguez, E. Dugas, … L. Quadrana·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2020
- A TOMATO GENOME FROM THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE PROVIDES INSIGHTS INTO COLUMBIAN AND PRE-COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE LINKS AND DOMESTICATION
R. A. Vos, T. R. van Andel, … A. Stefanaki·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2022
- Allele-specific expression reveals complex cis- and trans-regulatory divergence underlying fruit phenotypic differences between cultivated and wild tomato species
Jiantao Zhao, Philippe Nicolas, … Carmen Catalá·bioRxiv·May 30, 2026
- Development and application of SNP markers to facilitate DUS testing in tomato
Mathilde Causse, Frédérique Bitton C, … Damien Daniel Hinsinger·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2026
- Characterization of yield and fruit quality parameters of Vietnamese elite tomato lines generated through phenotypic selection and conventional breeding methods
C. C. Nguyen, R. M. Shelake, … J.-Y. Kim·EuphyticaPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2024