Sign in
BioinformaticsNAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

A comprehensive annotation and differential expression analysis of short and long non-coding RNAs in 16 bat genomes

Nelly Mostajo, Marie LataretuiD, Sebastian KrautwurstiD, Florian MockiD, Daniel DesiròiD, Kevin LamkiewicziD, Maximilian CollatziD, Andreas SchoeniD, Friedemann WeberiD, Manja MarziD, Martin HölzeriD

Abstract

Although bats are increasingly becoming the focus of scientific studies due to their unique properties, these exceptional animals are still among the least studied mammals. Assembly quality and completeness of bat genomes vary a lot and especially non-coding RNA (ncRNA) annotations are incomplete or simply missing. Accordingly, standard bioinformatics pipelines for gene expression analysis often ignore ncRNAs such as microRNAs or long antisense RNAs. The main cause of this problem is the use of incomplete genome annotations. We present a complete screening for ncRNAs within 16 bat genomes. NcRNAs affect a remarkable variety of vital biological functions, including gene expression regulation, RNA processing, RNA interference and, as recently described, regulatory processes in viral infections. Within all investigated bat assemblies we annotated 667 ncRNA families including 162 snoRNAs and 193 miRNAs as well as rRNAs, tRNAs, several snRNAs and IncRNAs, and other structural ncRNA elements. We validated our ncRNA candidates by six RNA-Seq data sets and show significant expression patterns that have never been described before in a bat species on such a large scale. Our annotations will be usable as a resource (Electronic Supplement) for deeper studying of bat evolution, ncRNAs repertoire, gene expression and regulation, ecology, and important host-virus interactions. Supplementary informationis available at rna.uni-jena.de/supplements/bats, the Open Science Framework (doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4CMDN), and GitHub (github.com/rnajena/bats_ncrna).

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
7
FWCI
0.17
Field percentile
45th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJebb '20Scheben '23Xu '19Waller '23Owolabi '25Geng '24
63% semantic matchGenomics
David Jebb, Zixia Huang, Martin Pippel+27 more·Nature·Jul 22, 2020· 361 citations