bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Quantifying the contribution of four resistance mechanisms to ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration in Escherichia coli: a systematic review
Boas C.L. van der PutteniD, Daniel RemondiniiD, Giovanni Pasquini, Victoria A. Janes, Sébastien MatamorosiD, Constance SchultsziD
Abstract
SynopsisO_ST_ABSIntroductionC_ST_ABSCiprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli is widespread and adds to the burden of E. coli infections. Reviews assessing the genetic basis of ciprofloxacin resistance have mostly been qualitative. However, to allow for the prediction of a resistance phenotype of clinical relevance based on genotypic characteristics, it is essential to quantify the contribution of prevalent genotypic determinants to resistance. We carried out a systematic review to assess the relative contribution of currently known genomic resistance determinants to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ciprofloxacin in E. coli.\n\nMethodsPubMed and Web of Science were searched for English language studies that assessed both ciprofloxacin MIC and the presence or introduction of genetic determinants of ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli. We included experimental and observational studies without time restrictions. Medians and ranges of MIC fold changes were calculated for each resistance determinant and for combinations of determinants.\n\nResultsWe included 66 studies, describing 604 E. coli isolates that carried at least one genetic resistance determinant. Genes coding for targets of ciprofloxacin (gyrA and parC) are strongest contributors to ciprofloxacin resistance, with median MIC fold increases ranging from 24 (range 4-133) for single Ser83Leu (gyrA) mutants to 1533 (range 256-8533) for triple Ser83Leu, Asp87Asn/Gly (gyrA) and Ser80Ile/Arg (parC) mutants. Other resistance mechanisms, including efflux, physical blocking or enzymatic modification, conferred smaller increases in ciprofloxacin MIC (median MIC fold increases typically around 15, range 1-125). However, the (combined) presence of these other resistance mechanisms further increases resistance with median MIC fold increases of up to 4000, and even in the absence of gyrA and parC mutations up to 250.\n\nConclusionThis report provides a comprehensive and quantitative overview of the contribution of different genomic determinants to ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli. Additionally, the data demonstrate the complexity of resistance phenotype prediction from genomic data and could serve as a reference point for studies aiming to address ciprofloxacin resistance prediction using genomics, in E. coli.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Understanding and predicting ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration in Escherichia coli with machine learning
B. A. Pataki, S. Matamoros, … COMPARE ML-AMR group·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2020
- Shared and Unique Evolutionary Trajectories to Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Gram-negative Bacterial Pathogens
J. E. Zlamal, S. A. Leyn, … A. L. Osterman·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021
- High-level ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with genomic adaptation, collateral antibiotic susceptibility, and physiological trade-offs
Abhijeet Sahu, Rohit Ruhal·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2026
- Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Hospital and Community-acquired Urinary Tract Infections by Escherichia coli: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Evolutionary instability of collateral susceptibility networks in ciprofloxacin resistant clinical Escherichia coli strains
V. Sorum, E. L. Oynes, … P. J. Johnsen·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2021
- Single point mutations in global regulatory genes restore cephalosporin resistance in a low-MIC Enterococcus faecium natural isolate
Miquel Sánchez−Osuna, Paula Bierge, … Òscar Q. Pich·Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2026