Quantitative differences in anaerobic growth and metabolism of three different E. coli strains using 13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis
Piyush PachauriiD, Trunil S. Desai, Ahmad AhmadiD, Shireesh SrivastavaiD
Abstract
Escherichia coli are model organisms for biotechnological research owing to their abilities to grow on defined media and consume a variety of carbon sources, as well as a vast knowledge base and tools available for their manipulation. Several E. coli strains and their derivatives are available. However, the quantitative metabolic differences between the strains could be better characterized. In this study, we investigated the differences in the intracellular flux distribution between three commonly used strains of E. coli (K-12 MG1655, C, and W) using 13C-Metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA), the gold standard in fluxomics. The labeling data was analyzed using FluxPyt, our previously developed Python-based tool. Threefold differences in the growth rates of these strains were observed when growing anaerobically on glucose in M9 medium, with E. coli W being the fastest ( = 0.62 {+/-} 0.01 h-1) and E. coli C the slowest ( = 0.22 {+/-} 0.01 h-1). The strains growth rates correlate with glucose uptake and flux through the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. Interestingly, succinate was a major product in E. coli C only. 13C-MFA revealed that under these conditions, Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway was active in E. coli C and E. coli W but not in E. coli K-12 MG1655. In E. coli K-12 MG1655 and E. coli C, the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle ran incompletely. Also, the glyoxylate shunt was inactive in all three strains. Growth, xylose intake rates, and product profiles on xylose mirrored those of glucose. Thus, this study has highlighted significant differences in the growth and metabolism of the E. coli strains on glucose and xylose. This will form a basis for identifying the best strain for a particular application.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Functional analysis of deoxyhexose sugar utilization in Escherichia coli reveals fermentative metabolism under aerobic conditions
P. Millard, J. Perochon, F. Letisse·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021
- The Sensitivity of 13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis to Biomass Composition Underscores the Need for Accurate Biomass Formulation in Escherichia coli
Yijing Cai, Maciek R. Antoniewicz·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2026
- Characterization of central carbon metabolism of Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5 based on 13C-metabolic flux analysis
愛理 宮本, Tatsumi Imada, … Yoshihiro Toya·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2026
- Evaluating non-oxidative glycolysis using 13C metabolic flux analysis
Kenta Miyoshi, Tatsumi Imada, … Hiroshi Shimizu·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- 13C flux ratio analysis with FRAPPPE reveals differences in metabolic fluxes between gut Bacteroidota and Escherichia coli
Daniel Torka, Bartosz Jan Bartmanski, … Maria Zimmermann‐Kogadeeva·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2026
- 13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis of Substrate Co-Metabolism in the Methylotrophic Acetogen Eubacterium limosum.
Kathryn O. Hoyt, William Gasparrini, … Benjamin M. Woolston·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026