Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential: testing effect sizes, retention over time, and associations with age in 415 healthy individuals
Mathias ValstadiD, Torgeir MobergetiD, Daniël RoelfsiD, Nora Berz SlapøiD, Clara M.F. Timpe, Dani BeckiD, Geneviève RichardiD, Linn Sofie SætheriD, Beathe C. HaatveitiD, Knut Andre Skaug, Jan Egil NordvikiD, Christoffer Hatlestad‐HalliD, Gaute T. EinevolliD, Tuomo Mäki‐MarttuneniD, Lars Tjelta WestlyeiD, Erik Gunnar JönssoniD, Ole A. AndreasseniD, Torbjørn ElvsåshageniD
Abstract
Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential (VEP) is a promising proxy measure of synaptic plasticity in the cerebral cortex. However, existing studies are limited by small to moderate sample sizes as well as by considerable variability in how VEP modulation is quantified. In the present study, we used a large sample (n = 415) of healthy volunteers to compare different quantifications of VEP modulation with regards to effect sizes and retention of the modulation effect over time. We observed significant modulation for VEP components C1 (Cohens d = 0.53), P1 (d = 0.66), N1 (d = -0.27), N1b (d = -0.66), but not P2 (p = 0.1), and in one time-frequency cluster (~30 Hz and ~70 ms post-stimulus; d = -0.48), 2-4 minutes after 2 Hz prolonged visual stimulation. For components N1 (d = -0.21) and N1b (d = -0.38), as well for the time-frequency cluster (d = -0.33), this effect was retained after 54-56 minutes. Moderate to high correlations ({rho} = [0.39, 0.69]) between modulation at different postintervention blocks revealed a relatively high temporal stability in the modulation effect for each VEP component. However, different VEP components also showed markedly different temporal retention patterns. Finally, P1 modulation correlated positively with age (t = 5.26), and was larger for female participants (t = 3.91), with no effects of either age or sex on N1 and N1b potentiation. These results provide strong support for VEP modulation, and especially N1b modulation, as a robust measure of synaptic plasticity, but underscore the need to differentiate between components, and to control for demographic confounders.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Stability of steady-state visual evoked potential contrast response functions
Ryan Thomas Ash, Kerry C. Nix, Anthony M. Norcia·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2023
- Evidence for reduced long-term potentiation-like visual cortical plasticity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Mathias Valstad, Daniël Roelfs, … Torbjørn Elvsåshagen·Schizophrenia BulletinPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2021
- Electrophysiological signatures of visual recognition memory across all layers of mouse V1
Dustin J. Hayden, Peter S.B. Finnie, … Mark F. Bear·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2023
- A correlational study between microstructural, macrostructural and functional age-related changes in the human visual cortex
H. Abrishami Moghaddam, S. Rahimi Malakshan, F. Daneshvarfard·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2022
- Norepinephrine Potentiates and Serotonin Depresses Visual Cortical Responses by Transforming Eligibility Traces
Su Z. Hong, Lukas Mesik, … Alfredo Kirkwood·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2022
- Stimulus-specific enhancement of responses in mouse primary visual cortex mediated by GABA release from VIP cells
Megumi Kaneko, Mahmood S. Hoseini, … Michael P. Stryker·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2023