A feature-specific prediction error model explains dopaminergic heterogeneity
Rachel S. LeeiD, Yotam SagiviD, Ben Engelhard, Ilana B. WitteniD, Nathaniel D. DawiD
Abstract
The hypothesis that midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons broadcast an error for the prediction of reward (reward prediction error, RPE) is among the great successes of computational neuroscience1-3. However, recent results contradict a core aspect of this theory: that the neurons uniformly convey a scalar, global signal. For instance, when animals are placed in a high-dimensional environment, DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) display substantial heterogeneity in the features to which they respond, while also having more consistent RPE-like responses at the time of reward4. We argue that the previously predominant family of extensions to the RPE model, which replicate the classic model in multiple parallel circuits, are ill-suited to explaining these and other results concerning DA heterogeneity within the VTA. Instead, we introduce a complementary "feature-specific RPE" model positing that DA neurons within VTA report individual RPEs for different elements of a population vector code for an animals state (moment-to-moment situation). To investigate this claim, we train a deep reinforcement learning model on a navigation and decision-making task and compare the feature-specific RPE derived from the network to population recordings from DA neurons during the same task. The model recapitulates key aspects of VTA DA neuron heterogeneity. Further, we show how our framework can be extended to explain patterns of heterogeneity in action responses reported among SNc DA neurons5. Thus, our work provides a path to reconcile new observations of DA neuron heterogeneity with classic ideas about RPE coding, while also providing a new perspective on how the brain performs reinforcement learning in high dimensional environments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 86
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Learning to Express Reward Prediction Error-like Dopaminergic Activity Requires Plastic Representations of Time
Ian Cone, Claudia Clopath A, Harel Z. Shouval·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2024
- Rewarding Value or Prediction Error: Settling the debate over the role of dopamine in reward learning
Alexandra A Usypchuk, Etienne J. P. Maes, … Mihaela D Iordanova·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2025
- Context-dependent multiplexing by individual VTA dopamine neurons
Yves Kremer, Jérôme Flakowski, … Christian Lüscher·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2019
- A history-derived reward prediction error signal in ventral pallidum
David J. Ottenheimer, Bilal A. Bari, … Patricia H. Janak·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2020
- Rethinking dopamine as generalized prediction error
Matthew Gardner, Geoffrey M. Schoenbaum, Samuel Joseph Gershman·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2018
- Dopamine transients encode reward prediction errorsindependent of learning rates
Andrew Mah, Carla E. M. Golden, Christine M. Constantinople·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024